100 lines
4.8 KiB
Diff
100 lines
4.8 KiB
Diff
|
From f8bfa4d8ce6b831058935c793e9d9180a46e4171 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||
|
From: ajberkley <ajberkley@gmail.com>
|
||
|
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 14:21:22 -0700
|
||
|
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix to work with SBCL 2.4.0 and later
|
||
|
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp | 54 +++++++++++++-------------
|
||
|
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
diff --git a/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp b/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp
|
||
|
index c00c1b0..68c0b08 100644
|
||
|
--- a/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp
|
||
|
+++ b/code/expand-effective-method-body.lisp
|
||
|
@@ -2,35 +2,37 @@
|
||
|
|
||
|
(defun expand-effective-method-body
|
||
|
(effective-method generic-function lambda-list)
|
||
|
- (trivial-macroexpand-all:macroexpand-all
|
||
|
- `(let ((.gf. #',(generic-function-name generic-function)))
|
||
|
- (declare (ignorable .gf.))
|
||
|
- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:call-method))
|
||
|
- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:make-method))
|
||
|
- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords))
|
||
|
- #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks sb-pcl::%no-primary-method))
|
||
|
- (macrolet
|
||
|
- (;; SBCL introduces explicit keyword argument checking into
|
||
|
- ;; the effective method. Since we do our own checking, we
|
||
|
- ;; can safely disable it. However, we touch the relevant
|
||
|
- ;; variables to prevent unused variable warnings.
|
||
|
- #+sbcl
|
||
|
- (sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords (&rest args)
|
||
|
- (declare (ignore args))
|
||
|
- `(progn sb-pcl::.valid-keys. sb-pcl::.keyargs-start. (values)))
|
||
|
- ;; SBCL introduces a magic form to report when there are no
|
||
|
- ;; primary methods. The problem is that this form contains a
|
||
|
- ;; reference to the literal generic function, which is not an
|
||
|
- ;; externalizable object. Our solution is to replace it with
|
||
|
- ;; something portable.
|
||
|
- #+sbcl
|
||
|
- (sb-pcl::%no-primary-method (&rest args)
|
||
|
- (declare (ignore args))
|
||
|
- `(apply #'no-primary-method .gf. ,@',(lambda-list-apply-arguments lambda-list))))
|
||
|
+ (let ((%no-primary-method (find-symbol "%NO-PRIMARY-METHOD" :sb-pcl)))
|
||
|
+ (trivial-macroexpand-all:macroexpand-all
|
||
|
+ `(let ((.gf. #',(generic-function-name generic-function)))
|
||
|
+ (declare (ignorable .gf.))
|
||
|
+ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:call-method))
|
||
|
+ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks common-lisp:make-method))
|
||
|
+ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords))
|
||
|
+ #+sbcl(declare (sb-ext:disable-package-locks ,%no-primary-method))
|
||
|
+ (macrolet
|
||
|
+ (;; SBCL introduces explicit keyword argument checking into
|
||
|
+ ;; the effective method. Since we do our own checking, we
|
||
|
+ ;; can safely disable it. However, we touch the relevant
|
||
|
+ ;; variables to prevent unused variable warnings.
|
||
|
+ #+sbcl
|
||
|
+ (sb-pcl::check-applicable-keywords (&rest args)
|
||
|
+ (declare (ignore args))
|
||
|
+ `(progn sb-pcl::.valid-keys. sb-pcl::.keyargs-start. (values)))
|
||
|
+ ;; SBCL introduces a magic form to report when there are no
|
||
|
+ ;; primary methods. The problem is that this form contains a
|
||
|
+ ;; reference to the literal generic function, which is not an
|
||
|
+ ;; externalizable object. Our solution is to replace it with
|
||
|
+ ;; something portable.
|
||
|
+ #+sbcl
|
||
|
+ ,(when %no-primary-method
|
||
|
+ `(,%no-primary-method (&rest args)
|
||
|
+ (declare (ignore args))
|
||
|
+ `(apply #'no-primary-method .gf. ,@',(lambda-list-apply-arguments lambda-list)))))
|
||
|
,(wrap-in-call-method-macrolet
|
||
|
effective-method
|
||
|
generic-function
|
||
|
- lambda-list)))))
|
||
|
+ lambda-list))))))
|
||
|
|
||
|
(defun wrap-in-call-method-macrolet (form generic-function lambda-list)
|
||
|
`(macrolet ((call-method (method &optional next-methods)
|
||
|
|
||
|
From 01baf2bc9157762029de11ab64429999fa7a58da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||
|
From: ajberkley <ajberkley@gmail.com>
|
||
|
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 14:37:58 -0700
|
||
|
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix for SBCL
|
||
|
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
code/sbcl.lisp | 2 +-
|
||
|
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
diff --git a/code/sbcl.lisp b/code/sbcl.lisp
|
||
|
index 9e206a8..b97c00a 100644
|
||
|
--- a/code/sbcl.lisp
|
||
|
+++ b/code/sbcl.lisp
|
||
|
@@ -13,6 +13,6 @@
|
||
|
(prototypes static-call-signature-prototypes))
|
||
|
static-call-signature
|
||
|
(eval
|
||
|
- `(sb-c:deftransform ,name ((&rest args) (,@types &rest *))
|
||
|
+ `(sb-c:deftransform ,name ((&rest args) (,@types &rest t))
|
||
|
(or (optimize-function-call #',name ',static-call-signature)
|
||
|
(sb-c::give-up-ir1-transform))))))))
|