From 4fe9aae225fa4ee0416d7cfa984bda8fcded8436 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rostislav Svoboda Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:00:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Correct the "guix package --install-from-expression" example. * doc/guix.texi (Invoking @command{guix package}): Correct the module where 'guile-final' is defined. It is actually located in (gnu packages commencement) rather than in the (gnu packages base). Change-Id: I7747106916d53dcbe296b7302983c5013eb2926d Signed-off-by: Christopher Baines --- doc/guix.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 796ac0028f..17130845bd 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -3445,7 +3445,7 @@ Install the package @var{exp} evaluates to. @var{exp} must be a Scheme expression that evaluates to a @code{} object. This option is notably useful to disambiguate between same-named variants of a package, with expressions such as -@code{(@@ (gnu packages base) guile-final)}. +@code{(@@ (gnu packages commencement) guile-final)}. Note that this option installs the first output of the specified package, which may be insufficient when needing a specific output of a