Revert "packages: 'package-grafts' trims native inputs."
This reverts commit 91c9b5d016
following the concerns raised by Mark, Ben, and Tobias:
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-12/msg00081.html>.
master
parent
f0eb57b736
commit
609d126e86
|
@ -1004,21 +1004,7 @@ dependencies; otherwise, restrict to target dependencies."
|
|||
(if (bag-target bag)
|
||||
'()
|
||||
(bag-host-inputs bag))))
|
||||
(lambda (bag)
|
||||
(if (bag-target bag)
|
||||
(bag-host-inputs bag)
|
||||
|
||||
;; XXX: Currently libc wrongfully ends up in 'build-inputs',
|
||||
;; even tough it's something that's still referenced at run time
|
||||
;; and thus conceptually a 'host-inputs'. Because of that, we
|
||||
;; re-add it here.
|
||||
(if (assoc-ref (bag-host-inputs bag) "libc")
|
||||
(bag-host-inputs bag)
|
||||
(append (let ((libc (assoc-ref (bag-build-inputs bag)
|
||||
"libc")))
|
||||
(or (and libc `(("libc" ,@libc)))
|
||||
'()))
|
||||
(bag-host-inputs bag)))))))
|
||||
bag-host-inputs))
|
||||
|
||||
(define nodes
|
||||
(match (bag-direct-inputs* bag)
|
||||
|
@ -1052,28 +1038,33 @@ to (see 'graft-derivation'.)"
|
|||
(define system (bag-system bag))
|
||||
(define target (bag-target bag))
|
||||
|
||||
(define (grafts package->graft)
|
||||
(fold-bag-dependencies (lambda (package grafts)
|
||||
(match (package->graft package)
|
||||
(#f grafts)
|
||||
(graft (cons graft grafts))))
|
||||
'()
|
||||
bag
|
||||
(define native-grafts
|
||||
(let ((->graft (input-graft store system)))
|
||||
(fold-bag-dependencies (lambda (package grafts)
|
||||
(match (->graft package)
|
||||
(#f grafts)
|
||||
(graft (cons graft grafts))))
|
||||
'()
|
||||
bag)))
|
||||
|
||||
;; Grafts that apply to native inputs do not matter
|
||||
;; since, by definition, native inputs are not
|
||||
;; referred to at run time. Thus, ignore
|
||||
;; 'native-inputs' and focus on the others.
|
||||
#:native? #f))
|
||||
(define target-grafts
|
||||
(if target
|
||||
(let ((->graft (input-cross-graft store target system)))
|
||||
(fold-bag-dependencies (lambda (package grafts)
|
||||
(match (->graft package)
|
||||
(#f grafts)
|
||||
(graft (cons graft grafts))))
|
||||
'()
|
||||
bag
|
||||
#:native? #f))
|
||||
'()))
|
||||
|
||||
;; We can end up with several identical grafts if we stumble upon packages
|
||||
;; that are not 'eq?' but map to the same derivation (this can happen when
|
||||
;; using things like 'package-with-explicit-inputs'.) Hence the
|
||||
;; 'delete-duplicates' call.
|
||||
(delete-duplicates
|
||||
(if target
|
||||
(grafts (input-cross-graft store target system))
|
||||
(grafts (input-graft store system)))))
|
||||
(append native-grafts target-grafts)))
|
||||
|
||||
(define* (package-grafts store package
|
||||
#:optional (system (%current-system))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -660,24 +660,6 @@
|
|||
;; (package-cross-derivation %store p "mips64el-linux-gnu"
|
||||
;; #:graft? #t)))
|
||||
|
||||
;; It doesn't make sense for 'package-grafts' to look at native inputs since,
|
||||
;; by definition, they are not referenced at run time. Make sure
|
||||
;; 'package-grafts' respects this.
|
||||
(test-equal "package-grafts, grafts of native inputs ignored"
|
||||
'()
|
||||
(let* ((new (dummy-package "native-dep"
|
||||
(version "0.1")
|
||||
(arguments '(#:implicit-inputs? #f))))
|
||||
(ndep (package (inherit new) (version "0.0")
|
||||
(replacement new)))
|
||||
(dep (dummy-package "dep"
|
||||
(arguments '(#:implicit-inputs? #f))))
|
||||
(dummy (dummy-package "dummy"
|
||||
(arguments '(#:implicit-inputs? #f))
|
||||
(native-inputs `(("ndep" ,ndep)))
|
||||
(inputs `(("dep" ,dep))))))
|
||||
(package-grafts %store dummy)))
|
||||
|
||||
(test-assert "package-grafts, indirect grafts"
|
||||
(let* ((new (dummy-package "dep"
|
||||
(arguments '(#:implicit-inputs? #f))))
|
||||
|
|
Reference in New Issue