me
/
guix
Archived
1
0
Fork 0

gnu: binutils: Fix CVE-2021-45078.

This is for the release branch.

Should we also use a graft for the master branch? It would be even
better if we could add a binutils-next package that users could install,
in my opinion.

* gnu/packages/patches/binutils-CVE-2021-45078.patch: New file.
* gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
* gnu/packages/base.scm (binutils)[source]: Use it.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
master
Leo Famulari 2021-12-24 13:16:54 -05:00 committed by Maxim Cournoyer
parent db912d77a8
commit 8636d02955
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 1260E46482E63562
3 changed files with 260 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -908,6 +908,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA = \
%D%/packages/patches/binutils-loongson-workaround.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/binutils-mingw-w64-timestamp.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/binutils-mingw-w64-deterministic.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/binutils-CVE-2021-45078.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/bpftrace-disable-bfd-disasm.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/byobu-writable-status.patch \
%D%/packages/patches/cabal-install-base16-bytestring1.0.patch \

View File

@ -521,7 +521,8 @@ change. GNU make offers many powerful extensions over the standard utility.")
(sha256
(base32 "1m3b2rdfv1dmdpd0bzg1hy7i8a2qng53szc6livyi3nh6101mz37"))
(patches (search-patches "binutils-loongson-workaround.patch"
"binutils-2.37-file-descriptor-leak.patch"))))
"binutils-2.37-file-descriptor-leak.patch"
"binutils-CVE-2021-45078.patch"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
(arguments
`(#:out-of-source? #t ;recommended in the README

View File

@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
Fix CVE-2021-45078 (incomplete fix for CVE-2018-12699):
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-45078
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28694
Patch copied from upstream source repository:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=161e87d12167b1e36193385485c1f6ce92f74f02
From 161e87d12167b1e36193385485c1f6ce92f74f02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:48:42 +1030
Subject: [PATCH] PR28694, Out-of-bounds write in stab_xcoff_builtin_type
PR 28694
* stabs.c (stab_xcoff_builtin_type): Make typenum unsigned.
Negate typenum earlier, simplifying bounds checking. Correct
off-by-one indexing. Adjust switch cases.
---
binutils/stabs.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/binutils/stabs.c b/binutils/stabs.c
index 274bfb0e7fa..83ee3ea5fa4 100644
--- a/binutils/stabs.c
+++ b/binutils/stabs.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static debug_type stab_find_type (void *, struct stab_handle *, const int *);
static bool stab_record_type
(void *, struct stab_handle *, const int *, debug_type);
static debug_type stab_xcoff_builtin_type
- (void *, struct stab_handle *, int);
+ (void *, struct stab_handle *, unsigned int);
static debug_type stab_find_tagged_type
(void *, struct stab_handle *, const char *, int, enum debug_type_kind);
static debug_type *stab_demangle_argtypes
@@ -3496,166 +3496,167 @@ stab_record_type (void *dhandle ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, struct stab_handle *info,
static debug_type
stab_xcoff_builtin_type (void *dhandle, struct stab_handle *info,
- int typenum)
+ unsigned int typenum)
{
debug_type rettype;
const char *name;
- if (typenum >= 0 || typenum < -XCOFF_TYPE_COUNT)
+ typenum = -typenum - 1;
+ if (typenum >= XCOFF_TYPE_COUNT)
{
- fprintf (stderr, _("Unrecognized XCOFF type %d\n"), typenum);
+ fprintf (stderr, _("Unrecognized XCOFF type %d\n"), -typenum - 1);
return DEBUG_TYPE_NULL;
}
- if (info->xcoff_types[-typenum] != NULL)
- return info->xcoff_types[-typenum];
+ if (info->xcoff_types[typenum] != NULL)
+ return info->xcoff_types[typenum];
- switch (-typenum)
+ switch (typenum)
{
- case 1:
+ case 0:
/* The size of this and all the other types are fixed, defined
by the debugging format. */
name = "int";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 4, false);
break;
- case 2:
+ case 1:
name = "char";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 1, false);
break;
- case 3:
+ case 2:
name = "short";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 2, false);
break;
- case 4:
+ case 3:
name = "long";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 4, false);
break;
- case 5:
+ case 4:
name = "unsigned char";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 1, true);
break;
- case 6:
+ case 5:
name = "signed char";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 1, false);
break;
- case 7:
+ case 6:
name = "unsigned short";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 2, true);
break;
- case 8:
+ case 7:
name = "unsigned int";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 4, true);
break;
- case 9:
+ case 8:
name = "unsigned";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 4, true);
break;
- case 10:
+ case 9:
name = "unsigned long";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 4, true);
break;
- case 11:
+ case 10:
name = "void";
rettype = debug_make_void_type (dhandle);
break;
- case 12:
+ case 11:
/* IEEE single precision (32 bit). */
name = "float";
rettype = debug_make_float_type (dhandle, 4);
break;
- case 13:
+ case 12:
/* IEEE double precision (64 bit). */
name = "double";
rettype = debug_make_float_type (dhandle, 8);
break;
- case 14:
+ case 13:
/* This is an IEEE double on the RS/6000, and different machines
with different sizes for "long double" should use different
negative type numbers. See stabs.texinfo. */
name = "long double";
rettype = debug_make_float_type (dhandle, 8);
break;
- case 15:
+ case 14:
name = "integer";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 4, false);
break;
- case 16:
+ case 15:
name = "boolean";
rettype = debug_make_bool_type (dhandle, 4);
break;
- case 17:
+ case 16:
name = "short real";
rettype = debug_make_float_type (dhandle, 4);
break;
- case 18:
+ case 17:
name = "real";
rettype = debug_make_float_type (dhandle, 8);
break;
- case 19:
+ case 18:
/* FIXME */
name = "stringptr";
rettype = NULL;
break;
- case 20:
+ case 19:
/* FIXME */
name = "character";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 1, true);
break;
- case 21:
+ case 20:
name = "logical*1";
rettype = debug_make_bool_type (dhandle, 1);
break;
- case 22:
+ case 21:
name = "logical*2";
rettype = debug_make_bool_type (dhandle, 2);
break;
- case 23:
+ case 22:
name = "logical*4";
rettype = debug_make_bool_type (dhandle, 4);
break;
- case 24:
+ case 23:
name = "logical";
rettype = debug_make_bool_type (dhandle, 4);
break;
- case 25:
+ case 24:
/* Complex type consisting of two IEEE single precision values. */
name = "complex";
rettype = debug_make_complex_type (dhandle, 8);
break;
- case 26:
+ case 25:
/* Complex type consisting of two IEEE double precision values. */
name = "double complex";
rettype = debug_make_complex_type (dhandle, 16);
break;
- case 27:
+ case 26:
name = "integer*1";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 1, false);
break;
- case 28:
+ case 27:
name = "integer*2";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 2, false);
break;
- case 29:
+ case 28:
name = "integer*4";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 4, false);
break;
- case 30:
+ case 29:
/* FIXME */
name = "wchar";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 2, false);
break;
- case 31:
+ case 30:
name = "long long";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 8, false);
break;
- case 32:
+ case 31:
name = "unsigned long long";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 8, true);
break;
- case 33:
+ case 32:
name = "logical*8";
rettype = debug_make_bool_type (dhandle, 8);
break;
- case 34:
+ case 33:
name = "integer*8";
rettype = debug_make_int_type (dhandle, 8, false);
break;
@@ -3664,9 +3665,7 @@ stab_xcoff_builtin_type (void *dhandle, struct stab_handle *info,
}
rettype = debug_name_type (dhandle, name, rettype);
-
- info->xcoff_types[-typenum] = rettype;
-
+ info->xcoff_types[typenum] = rettype;
return rettype;
}
--
2.27.0