doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation.
* doc/contributing.texi (Commit Revocation): Expound.master
parent
d475134245
commit
d3d6d1c6eb
|
@ -1466,6 +1466,27 @@ key removed from @file{.guix-authorizations} after 12 months of
|
||||||
inactivity; they can ask to regain commit access by emailing the
|
inactivity; they can ask to regain commit access by emailing the
|
||||||
maintainers, without going through the vouching process.
|
maintainers, without going through the vouching process.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Maintainers@footnote{See @uref{https://guix.gnu.org/en/about} for the
|
||||||
|
current list of maintainers. You can email them privately at
|
||||||
|
@email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}.} may also revoke an individual's
|
||||||
|
commit rights, as a last resort, if cooperation with the rest of the
|
||||||
|
community has caused too much friction---even within the bounds of the
|
||||||
|
project's code of conduct (@pxref{Contributing}). They would only do so
|
||||||
|
after public or private discussion with the individual and a clear
|
||||||
|
notice. Examples of behavior that hinders cooperation and could lead to
|
||||||
|
such a decision include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@itemize
|
||||||
|
@item repeated violation of the commit policy stated above;
|
||||||
|
@item repeated failure to take peer criticism into account;
|
||||||
|
@item breaching trust through a series of grave incidents.
|
||||||
|
@end itemize
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When maintainers resort to such a decision, they notify developers on
|
||||||
|
@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org}; inquiries may be sent to
|
||||||
|
@email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}. Depending on the situation, the
|
||||||
|
individual may still be welcome to contribute.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@subsection Helping Out
|
@subsection Helping Out
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One last thing: the project keeps moving forward because committers not
|
One last thing: the project keeps moving forward because committers not
|
||||||
|
|
Reference in New Issue