doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation.
* doc/contributing.texi (Commit Revocation): Expound.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									d475134245
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						d3d6d1c6eb
					
				
					 1 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -1466,6 +1466,27 @@ key removed from @file{.guix-authorizations} after 12 months of | |||
| inactivity; they can ask to regain commit access by emailing the | ||||
| maintainers, without going through the vouching process. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Maintainers@footnote{See @uref{https://guix.gnu.org/en/about} for the | ||||
| current list of maintainers.  You can email them privately at | ||||
| @email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}.} may also revoke an individual's | ||||
| commit rights, as a last resort, if cooperation with the rest of the | ||||
| community has caused too much friction---even within the bounds of the | ||||
| project's code of conduct (@pxref{Contributing}).  They would only do so | ||||
| after public or private discussion with the individual and a clear | ||||
| notice.  Examples of behavior that hinders cooperation and could lead to | ||||
| such a decision include: | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| @itemize | ||||
| @item repeated violation of the commit policy stated above; | ||||
| @item repeated failure to take peer criticism into account; | ||||
| @item breaching trust through a series of grave incidents. | ||||
| @end itemize | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| When maintainers resort to such a decision, they notify developers on | ||||
| @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org}; inquiries may be sent to | ||||
| @email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}.  Depending on the situation, the | ||||
| individual may still be welcome to contribute. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| @subsection Helping Out | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| One last thing: the project keeps moving forward because committers not | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Reference in a new issue