* doc/contributing.texi (Submitting Patches): Remove powerpc-linux examples. * doc/guix.texi (Virtualization Services): Replace powerpc-linux example with mips64el-linux.
		
			
				
	
	
		
			987 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			40 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			987 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			40 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Text
		
	
	
	
	
	
| @node Contributing
 | ||
| @chapter Contributing
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| This project is a cooperative effort, and we need your help to make it
 | ||
| grow!  Please get in touch with us on @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org} and
 | ||
| @code{#guix} on the Freenode IRC network.  We welcome ideas, bug
 | ||
| reports, patches, and anything that may be helpful to the project.  We
 | ||
| particularly welcome help on packaging (@pxref{Packaging Guidelines}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex code of conduct, of contributors
 | ||
| @cindex contributor covenant
 | ||
| We want to provide a warm, friendly, and harassment-free environment, so
 | ||
| that anyone can contribute to the best of their abilities.  To this end
 | ||
| our project uses a ``Contributor Covenant'', which was adapted from
 | ||
| @url{http://contributor-covenant.org/}.  You can find a local version in
 | ||
| the @file{CODE-OF-CONDUCT} file in the source tree.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Contributors are not required to use their legal name in patches and
 | ||
| on-line communication; they can use any name or pseudonym of their
 | ||
| choice.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @menu
 | ||
| * Building from Git::           The latest and greatest.
 | ||
| * Running Guix Before It Is Installed::  Hacker tricks.
 | ||
| * The Perfect Setup::           The right tools.
 | ||
| * Packaging Guidelines::        Growing the distribution.
 | ||
| * Coding Style::                Hygiene of the contributor.
 | ||
| * Submitting Patches::          Share your work.
 | ||
| @end menu
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Building from Git
 | ||
| @section Building from Git
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| If you want to hack Guix itself, it is recommended to use the latest
 | ||
| version from the Git repository:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| When building Guix from a checkout,
 | ||
| the following packages are required in addition to those mentioned in
 | ||
| the installation instructions (@pxref{Requirements}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @itemize
 | ||
| @item @url{http://gnu.org/software/autoconf/, GNU Autoconf};
 | ||
| @item @url{http://gnu.org/software/automake/, GNU Automake};
 | ||
| @item @url{http://gnu.org/software/gettext/, GNU Gettext};
 | ||
| @item @url{http://gnu.org/software/texinfo/, GNU Texinfo};
 | ||
| @item @url{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz};
 | ||
| @item @url{http://www.gnu.org/software/help2man/, GNU Help2man (optional)}.
 | ||
| @end itemize
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The easiest way to set up a development environment for Guix is, of
 | ||
| course, by using Guix!  The following command starts a new shell where
 | ||
| all the dependencies and appropriate environment variables are set up to
 | ||
| hack on Guix:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| guix environment guix
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @xref{Invoking guix environment}, for more information on that command.
 | ||
| Extra dependencies can be added with @option{--ad-hoc}:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| guix environment guix --ad-hoc help2man git strace
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Run @command{./bootstrap} to generate the build system infrastructure
 | ||
| using Autoconf and Automake.  If you get an error like this one:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| configure.ac:46: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_CHECK_MODULES
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @noindent
 | ||
| it probably means that Autoconf couldn’t find @file{pkg.m4}, which is
 | ||
| provided by pkg-config.  Make sure that @file{pkg.m4} is available.  The
 | ||
| same holds for the @file{guile.m4} set of macros provided by Guile.  For
 | ||
| instance, if you installed Automake in @file{/usr/local}, it wouldn’t
 | ||
| look for @file{.m4} files in @file{/usr/share}.  In that case, you have
 | ||
| to invoke the following command:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| export ACLOCAL_PATH=/usr/share/aclocal
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @xref{Macro Search Path,,, automake, The GNU Automake Manual}, for
 | ||
| more information.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Then, run @command{./configure} as usual.  Make sure to pass
 | ||
| @code{--localstatedir=@var{directory}} where @var{directory} is the
 | ||
| @code{localstatedir} value used by your current installation (@pxref{The
 | ||
| Store}, for information about this).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Finally, you have to invoke @code{make check} to run tests
 | ||
| (@pxref{Running the Test Suite}).  If anything
 | ||
| fails, take a look at installation instructions (@pxref{Installation})
 | ||
| or send a message to the @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org, mailing list}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Running Guix Before It Is Installed
 | ||
| @section Running Guix Before It Is Installed
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| In order to keep a sane working environment, you will find it useful to
 | ||
| test the changes made in your local source tree checkout without
 | ||
| actually installing them.  So that you can distinguish between your
 | ||
| ``end-user'' hat and your ``motley'' costume.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| To that end, all the command-line tools can be used even if you have not
 | ||
| run @code{make install}.  To do that, you first need to have an environment
 | ||
| with all the dependencies available (@pxref{Building from Git}), and then
 | ||
| simply prefix each command with
 | ||
| @command{./pre-inst-env} (the @file{pre-inst-env} script lives in the
 | ||
| top build tree of Guix; it is generated by @command{./configure}),
 | ||
| as in@footnote{The @option{-E} flag to
 | ||
| @command{sudo} guarantees that @code{GUILE_LOAD_PATH} is correctly set
 | ||
| such that @command{guix-daemon} and the tools it uses can find the Guile
 | ||
| modules they need.}:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| $ sudo -E ./pre-inst-env guix-daemon --build-users-group=guixbuild
 | ||
| $ ./pre-inst-env guix build hello
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @noindent
 | ||
| Similarly, for a Guile session using the Guix modules:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| $ ./pre-inst-env guile -c '(use-modules (guix utils)) (pk (%current-system))'
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| ;;; ("x86_64-linux")
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @noindent
 | ||
| @cindex REPL
 | ||
| @cindex read-eval-print loop
 | ||
| @dots{} and for a REPL (@pxref{Using Guile Interactively,,, guile, Guile
 | ||
| Reference Manual}):
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| $ ./pre-inst-env guile
 | ||
| scheme@@(guile-user)> ,use(guix)
 | ||
| scheme@@(guile-user)> ,use(gnu)
 | ||
| scheme@@(guile-user)> (define snakes
 | ||
|                        (fold-packages
 | ||
|                          (lambda (package lst)
 | ||
|                            (if (string-prefix? "python"
 | ||
|                                                (package-name package))
 | ||
|                                (cons package lst)
 | ||
|                                lst))
 | ||
|                          '()))
 | ||
| scheme@@(guile-user)> (length snakes)
 | ||
| $1 = 361
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The @command{pre-inst-env} script sets up all the environment variables
 | ||
| necessary to support this, including @env{PATH} and @env{GUILE_LOAD_PATH}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Note that @command{./pre-inst-env guix pull} does @emph{not} upgrade the
 | ||
| local source tree; it simply updates the @file{~/.config/guix/current}
 | ||
| symlink (@pxref{Invoking guix pull}).  Run @command{git pull} instead if
 | ||
| you want to upgrade your local source tree.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node The Perfect Setup
 | ||
| @section The Perfect Setup
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The Perfect Setup to hack on Guix is basically the perfect setup used
 | ||
| for Guile hacking (@pxref{Using Guile in Emacs,,, guile, Guile Reference
 | ||
| Manual}).  First, you need more than an editor, you need
 | ||
| @url{http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs, Emacs}, empowered by the
 | ||
| wonderful @url{http://nongnu.org/geiser/, Geiser}.  To set that up, run:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| guix package -i emacs guile emacs-geiser
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Geiser allows for interactive and incremental development from within
 | ||
| Emacs: code compilation and evaluation from within buffers, access to
 | ||
| on-line documentation (docstrings), context-sensitive completion,
 | ||
| @kbd{M-.} to jump to an object definition, a REPL to try out your code,
 | ||
| and more (@pxref{Introduction,,, geiser, Geiser User Manual}).  For
 | ||
| convenient Guix development, make sure to augment Guile’s load path so
 | ||
| that it finds source files from your checkout:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @lisp
 | ||
| ;; @r{Assuming the Guix checkout is in ~/src/guix.}
 | ||
| (with-eval-after-load 'geiser-guile
 | ||
|   (add-to-list 'geiser-guile-load-path "~/src/guix"))
 | ||
| @end lisp
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| To actually edit the code, Emacs already has a neat Scheme mode.  But in
 | ||
| addition to that, you must not miss
 | ||
| @url{http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ParEdit, Paredit}.  It provides
 | ||
| facilities to directly operate on the syntax tree, such as raising an
 | ||
| s-expression or wrapping it, swallowing or rejecting the following
 | ||
| s-expression, etc.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex code snippets
 | ||
| @cindex templates
 | ||
| @cindex reducing boilerplate
 | ||
| We also provide templates for common git commit messages and package
 | ||
| definitions in the @file{etc/snippets} directory.  These templates can
 | ||
| be used with @url{http://joaotavora.github.io/yasnippet/, YASnippet} to
 | ||
| expand short trigger strings to interactive text snippets.  You may want
 | ||
| to add the snippets directory to the @var{yas-snippet-dirs} variable in
 | ||
| Emacs.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @lisp
 | ||
| ;; @r{Assuming the Guix checkout is in ~/src/guix.}
 | ||
| (with-eval-after-load 'yasnippet
 | ||
|   (add-to-list 'yas-snippet-dirs "~/src/guix/etc/snippets"))
 | ||
| @end lisp
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The commit message snippets depend on @url{https://magit.vc/, Magit} to
 | ||
| display staged files.  When editing a commit message type @code{add}
 | ||
| followed by @kbd{TAB} to insert a commit message template for adding a
 | ||
| package; type @code{update} followed by @kbd{TAB} to insert a template
 | ||
| for updating a package; type @code{https} followed by @kbd{TAB} to
 | ||
| insert a template for changing the home page URI of a package to HTTPS.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The main snippet for @code{scheme-mode} is triggered by typing
 | ||
| @code{package...} followed by @kbd{TAB}.  This snippet also inserts the
 | ||
| trigger string @code{origin...}, which can be expanded further.  The
 | ||
| @code{origin} snippet in turn may insert other trigger strings ending on
 | ||
| @code{...}, which also can be expanded further.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Packaging Guidelines
 | ||
| @section Packaging Guidelines
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex packages, creating
 | ||
| The GNU distribution is nascent and may well lack some of your favorite
 | ||
| packages.  This section describes how you can help make the distribution
 | ||
| grow.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Free software packages are usually distributed in the form of
 | ||
| @dfn{source code tarballs}---typically @file{tar.gz} files that contain
 | ||
| all the source files.  Adding a package to the distribution means
 | ||
| essentially two things: adding a @dfn{recipe} that describes how to
 | ||
| build the package, including a list of other packages required to build
 | ||
| it, and adding @dfn{package metadata} along with that recipe, such as a
 | ||
| description and licensing information.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| In Guix all this information is embodied in @dfn{package definitions}.
 | ||
| Package definitions provide a high-level view of the package.  They are
 | ||
| written using the syntax of the Scheme programming language; in fact,
 | ||
| for each package we define a variable bound to the package definition,
 | ||
| and export that variable from a module (@pxref{Package Modules}).
 | ||
| However, in-depth Scheme knowledge is @emph{not} a prerequisite for
 | ||
| creating packages.  For more information on package definitions,
 | ||
| @pxref{Defining Packages}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Once a package definition is in place, stored in a file in the Guix
 | ||
| source tree, it can be tested using the @command{guix build} command
 | ||
| (@pxref{Invoking guix build}).  For example, assuming the new package is
 | ||
| called @code{gnew}, you may run this command from the Guix build tree
 | ||
| (@pxref{Running Guix Before It Is Installed}):
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| ./pre-inst-env guix build gnew --keep-failed
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Using @code{--keep-failed} makes it easier to debug build failures since
 | ||
| it provides access to the failed build tree.  Another useful
 | ||
| command-line option when debugging is @code{--log-file}, to access the
 | ||
| build log.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| If the package is unknown to the @command{guix} command, it may be that
 | ||
| the source file contains a syntax error, or lacks a @code{define-public}
 | ||
| clause to export the package variable.  To figure it out, you may load
 | ||
| the module from Guile to get more information about the actual error:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| ./pre-inst-env guile -c '(use-modules (gnu packages gnew))'
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Once your package builds correctly, please send us a patch
 | ||
| (@pxref{Submitting Patches}).  Well, if you need help, we will be happy to
 | ||
| help you too.  Once the patch is committed in the Guix repository, the
 | ||
| new package automatically gets built on the supported platforms by
 | ||
| @url{http://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/master, our continuous integration
 | ||
| system}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex substituter
 | ||
| Users can obtain the new package definition simply by running
 | ||
| @command{guix pull} (@pxref{Invoking guix pull}).  When
 | ||
| @code{@value{SUBSTITUTE-SERVER}} is done building the package, installing the
 | ||
| package automatically downloads binaries from there
 | ||
| (@pxref{Substitutes}).  The only place where human intervention is
 | ||
| needed is to review and apply the patch.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @menu
 | ||
| * Software Freedom::            What may go into the distribution.
 | ||
| * Package Naming::              What's in a name?
 | ||
| * Version Numbers::             When the name is not enough.
 | ||
| * Synopses and Descriptions::   Helping users find the right package.
 | ||
| * Python Modules::              A touch of British comedy.
 | ||
| * Perl Modules::                Little pearls.
 | ||
| * Java Packages::               Coffee break.
 | ||
| * Fonts::                       Fond of fonts.
 | ||
| @end menu
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Software Freedom
 | ||
| @subsection Software Freedom
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @c Adapted from http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html.
 | ||
| @cindex free software
 | ||
| The GNU operating system has been developed so that users can have
 | ||
| freedom in their computing.  GNU is @dfn{free software}, meaning that
 | ||
| users have the @url{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html,four
 | ||
| essential freedoms}: to run the program, to study and change the program
 | ||
| in source code form, to redistribute exact copies, and to distribute
 | ||
| modified versions.  Packages found in the GNU distribution provide only
 | ||
| software that conveys these four freedoms.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| In addition, the GNU distribution follow the
 | ||
| @url{http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html,free
 | ||
| software distribution guidelines}.  Among other things, these guidelines
 | ||
| reject non-free firmware, recommendations of non-free software, and
 | ||
| discuss ways to deal with trademarks and patents.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Some otherwise free upstream package sources contain a small and optional
 | ||
| subset that violates the above guidelines, for instance because this subset
 | ||
| is itself non-free code.  When that happens, the offending items are removed
 | ||
| with appropriate patches or code snippets in the @code{origin} form of the
 | ||
| package (@pxref{Defining Packages}).  This way, @code{guix
 | ||
| build --source} returns the ``freed'' source rather than the unmodified
 | ||
| upstream source.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Package Naming
 | ||
| @subsection Package Naming
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex package name
 | ||
| A package has actually two names associated with it:
 | ||
| First, there is the name of the @emph{Scheme variable}, the one following
 | ||
| @code{define-public}.  By this name, the package can be made known in the
 | ||
| Scheme code, for instance as input to another package.  Second, there is
 | ||
| the string in the @code{name} field of a package definition.  This name
 | ||
| is used by package management commands such as
 | ||
| @command{guix package} and @command{guix build}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Both are usually the same and correspond to the lowercase conversion of
 | ||
| the project name chosen upstream, with underscores replaced with
 | ||
| hyphens.  For instance, GNUnet is available as @code{gnunet}, and
 | ||
| SDL_net as @code{sdl-net}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| We do not add @code{lib} prefixes for library packages, unless these are
 | ||
| already part of the official project name.  But @pxref{Python
 | ||
| Modules} and @ref{Perl Modules} for special rules concerning modules for
 | ||
| the Python and Perl languages.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Font package names are handled differently, @pxref{Fonts}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Version Numbers
 | ||
| @subsection Version Numbers
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex package version
 | ||
| We usually package only the latest version of a given free software
 | ||
| project.  But sometimes, for instance for incompatible library versions,
 | ||
| two (or more) versions of the same package are needed.  These require
 | ||
| different Scheme variable names.  We use the name as defined
 | ||
| in @ref{Package Naming}
 | ||
| for the most recent version; previous versions use the same name, suffixed
 | ||
| by @code{-} and the smallest prefix of the version number that may
 | ||
| distinguish the two versions.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The name inside the package definition is the same for all versions of a
 | ||
| package and does not contain any version number.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| For instance, the versions 2.24.20 and 3.9.12 of GTK+ may be packaged as follows:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| (define-public gtk+
 | ||
|   (package
 | ||
|     (name "gtk+")
 | ||
|     (version "3.9.12")
 | ||
|     ...))
 | ||
| (define-public gtk+-2
 | ||
|   (package
 | ||
|     (name "gtk+")
 | ||
|     (version "2.24.20")
 | ||
|     ...))
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| If we also wanted GTK+ 3.8.2, this would be packaged as
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| (define-public gtk+-3.8
 | ||
|   (package
 | ||
|     (name "gtk+")
 | ||
|     (version "3.8.2")
 | ||
|     ...))
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @c See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00425.html>,
 | ||
| @c for a discussion of what follows.
 | ||
| @cindex version number, for VCS snapshots
 | ||
| Occasionally, we package snapshots of upstream's version control system
 | ||
| (VCS) instead of formal releases.  This should remain exceptional,
 | ||
| because it is up to upstream developers to clarify what the stable
 | ||
| release is.  Yet, it is sometimes necessary.  So, what should we put in
 | ||
| the @code{version} field?
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Clearly, we need to make the commit identifier of the VCS snapshot
 | ||
| visible in the version string, but we also need to make sure that the
 | ||
| version string is monotonically increasing so that @command{guix package
 | ||
| --upgrade} can determine which version is newer.  Since commit
 | ||
| identifiers, notably with Git, are not monotonically increasing, we add
 | ||
| a revision number that we increase each time we upgrade to a newer
 | ||
| snapshot.  The resulting version string looks like this:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| 2.0.11-3.cabba9e
 | ||
|   ^    ^    ^
 | ||
|   |    |    `-- upstream commit ID
 | ||
|   |    |
 | ||
|   |    `--- Guix package revision
 | ||
|   |
 | ||
| latest upstream version
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| It is a good idea to strip commit identifiers in the @code{version}
 | ||
| field to, say, 7 digits.  It avoids an aesthetic annoyance (assuming
 | ||
| aesthetics have a role to play here) as well as problems related to OS
 | ||
| limits such as the maximum shebang length (127 bytes for the Linux
 | ||
| kernel.)  It is best to use the full commit identifiers in
 | ||
| @code{origin}s, though, to avoid ambiguities.  A typical package
 | ||
| definition may look like this:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| (define my-package
 | ||
|   (let ((commit "c3f29bc928d5900971f65965feaae59e1272a3f7")
 | ||
|         (revision "1"))          ;Guix package revision
 | ||
|     (package
 | ||
|       (version (git-version "0.9" revision commit))
 | ||
|       (source (origin
 | ||
|                 (method git-fetch)
 | ||
|                 (uri (git-reference
 | ||
|                       (url "git://example.org/my-package.git")
 | ||
|                       (commit commit)))
 | ||
|                 (sha256 (base32 "1mbikn@dots{}"))
 | ||
|                 (file-name (git-file-name name version))))
 | ||
|       ;; @dots{}
 | ||
|       )))
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Synopses and Descriptions
 | ||
| @subsection Synopses and Descriptions
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex package description
 | ||
| @cindex package synopsis
 | ||
| As we have seen before, each package in GNU@tie{}Guix includes a
 | ||
| synopsis and a description (@pxref{Defining Packages}).  Synopses and
 | ||
| descriptions are important: They are what @command{guix package
 | ||
| --search} searches, and a crucial piece of information to help users
 | ||
| determine whether a given package suits their needs.  Consequently,
 | ||
| packagers should pay attention to what goes into them.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Synopses must start with a capital letter and must not end with a
 | ||
| period.  They must not start with ``a'' or ``the'', which usually does
 | ||
| not bring anything; for instance, prefer ``File-frobbing tool'' over ``A
 | ||
| tool that frobs files''.  The synopsis should say what the package
 | ||
| is---e.g., ``Core GNU utilities (file, text, shell)''---or what it is
 | ||
| used for---e.g., the synopsis for GNU@tie{}grep is ``Print lines
 | ||
| matching a pattern''.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Keep in mind that the synopsis must be meaningful for a very wide
 | ||
| audience.  For example, ``Manipulate alignments in the SAM format''
 | ||
| might make sense for a seasoned bioinformatics researcher, but might be
 | ||
| fairly unhelpful or even misleading to a non-specialized audience.  It
 | ||
| is a good idea to come up with a synopsis that gives an idea of the
 | ||
| application domain of the package.  In this example, this might give
 | ||
| something like ``Manipulate nucleotide sequence alignments'', which
 | ||
| hopefully gives the user a better idea of whether this is what they are
 | ||
| looking for.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Descriptions should take between five and ten lines.  Use full
 | ||
| sentences, and avoid using acronyms without first introducing them.
 | ||
| Please avoid marketing phrases such as ``world-leading'',
 | ||
| ``industrial-strength'', and ``next-generation'', and avoid superlatives
 | ||
| like ``the most advanced''---they are not helpful to users looking for a
 | ||
| package and may even sound suspicious.  Instead, try to be factual,
 | ||
| mentioning use cases and features.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex Texinfo markup, in package descriptions
 | ||
| Descriptions can include Texinfo markup, which is useful to introduce
 | ||
| ornaments such as @code{@@code} or @code{@@dfn}, bullet lists, or
 | ||
| hyperlinks (@pxref{Overview,,, texinfo, GNU Texinfo}).  However you
 | ||
| should be careful when using some characters for example @samp{@@} and
 | ||
| curly braces which are the basic special characters in Texinfo
 | ||
| (@pxref{Special Characters,,, texinfo, GNU Texinfo}).  User interfaces
 | ||
| such as @command{guix package --show} take care of rendering it
 | ||
| appropriately.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Synopses and descriptions are translated by volunteers
 | ||
| @uref{http://translationproject.org/domain/guix-packages.html, at the
 | ||
| Translation Project} so that as many users as possible can read them in
 | ||
| their native language.  User interfaces search them and display them in
 | ||
| the language specified by the current locale.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| To allow @command{xgettext} to extract them as translatable strings,
 | ||
| synopses and descriptions @emph{must be literal strings}.  This means
 | ||
| that you cannot use @code{string-append} or @code{format} to construct
 | ||
| these strings:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @lisp
 | ||
| (package
 | ||
|   ;; @dots{}
 | ||
|   (synopsis "This is translatable")
 | ||
|   (description (string-append "This is " "*not*" " translatable.")))
 | ||
| @end lisp
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Translation is a lot of work so, as a packager, please pay even more
 | ||
| attention to your synopses and descriptions as every change may entail
 | ||
| additional work for translators.  In order to help them, it is possible
 | ||
| to make recommendations or instructions visible to them by inserting
 | ||
| special comments like this (@pxref{xgettext Invocation,,, gettext, GNU
 | ||
| Gettext}):
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| ;; TRANSLATORS: "X11 resize-and-rotate" should not be translated.
 | ||
| (description "ARandR is designed to provide a simple visual front end
 | ||
| for the X11 resize-and-rotate (RandR) extension. @dots{}")
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Python Modules
 | ||
| @subsection Python Modules
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex python
 | ||
| We currently package Python 2 and Python 3, under the Scheme variable names
 | ||
| @code{python-2} and @code{python} as explained in @ref{Version Numbers}.
 | ||
| To avoid confusion and naming clashes with other programming languages, it
 | ||
| seems desirable that the name of a package for a Python module contains
 | ||
| the word @code{python}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Some modules are compatible with only one version of Python, others with both.
 | ||
| If the package Foo compiles only with Python 3, we name it
 | ||
| @code{python-foo}; if it compiles only with Python 2, we name it
 | ||
| @code{python2-foo}. If it is compatible with both versions, we create two
 | ||
| packages with the corresponding names.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| If a project already contains the word @code{python}, we drop this;
 | ||
| for instance, the module python-dateutil is packaged under the names
 | ||
| @code{python-dateutil} and @code{python2-dateutil}.  If the project name
 | ||
| starts with @code{py} (e.g.@: @code{pytz}), we keep it and prefix it as
 | ||
| described above.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @subsubsection Specifying Dependencies
 | ||
| @cindex inputs, for Python packages
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Dependency information for Python packages is usually available in the
 | ||
| package source tree, with varying degrees of accuracy: in the
 | ||
| @file{setup.py} file, in @file{requirements.txt}, or in @file{tox.ini}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Your mission, when writing a recipe for a Python package, is to map
 | ||
| these dependencies to the appropriate type of ``input'' (@pxref{package
 | ||
| Reference, inputs}).  Although the @code{pypi} importer normally does a
 | ||
| good job (@pxref{Invoking guix import}), you may want to check the
 | ||
| following check list to determine which dependency goes where.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @itemize
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| We currently package Python 2 with @code{setuptools} and @code{pip}
 | ||
| installed like Python 3.4 has per default.  Thus you don't need to
 | ||
| specify either of these as an input.  @command{guix lint} will warn you
 | ||
| if you do.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Python dependencies required at run time go into
 | ||
| @code{propagated-inputs}.  They are typically defined with the
 | ||
| @code{install_requires} keyword in @file{setup.py}, or in the
 | ||
| @file{requirements.txt} file.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Python packages required only at build time---e.g., those listed with
 | ||
| the @code{setup_requires} keyword in @file{setup.py}---or only for
 | ||
| testing---e.g., those in @code{tests_require}---go into
 | ||
| @code{native-inputs}.  The rationale is that (1) they do not need to be
 | ||
| propagated because they are not needed at run time, and (2) in a
 | ||
| cross-compilation context, it's the ``native'' input that we'd want.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Examples are the @code{pytest}, @code{mock}, and @code{nose} test
 | ||
| frameworks.  Of course if any of these packages is also required at
 | ||
| run-time, it needs to go to @code{propagated-inputs}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Anything that does not fall in the previous categories goes to
 | ||
| @code{inputs}, for example programs or C libraries required for building
 | ||
| Python packages containing C extensions.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| If a Python package has optional dependencies (@code{extras_require}),
 | ||
| it is up to you to decide whether to add them or not, based on their
 | ||
| usefulness/overhead ratio (@pxref{Submitting Patches, @command{guix
 | ||
| size}}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @end itemize
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Perl Modules
 | ||
| @subsection Perl Modules
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex perl
 | ||
| Perl programs standing for themselves are named as any other package,
 | ||
| using the lowercase upstream name.
 | ||
| For Perl packages containing a single class, we use the lowercase class name,
 | ||
| replace all occurrences of @code{::} by dashes and prepend the prefix
 | ||
| @code{perl-}.
 | ||
| So the class @code{XML::Parser} becomes @code{perl-xml-parser}.
 | ||
| Modules containing several classes keep their lowercase upstream name and
 | ||
| are also prepended by @code{perl-}.  Such modules tend to have the word
 | ||
| @code{perl} somewhere in their name, which gets dropped in favor of the
 | ||
| prefix.  For instance, @code{libwww-perl} becomes @code{perl-libwww}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Java Packages
 | ||
| @subsection Java Packages
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex java
 | ||
| Java programs standing for themselves are named as any other package,
 | ||
| using the lowercase upstream name.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| To avoid confusion and naming clashes with other programming languages,
 | ||
| it is desirable that the name of a package for a Java package is
 | ||
| prefixed with @code{java-}.  If a project already contains the word
 | ||
| @code{java}, we drop this; for instance, the package @code{ngsjava} is
 | ||
| packaged under the name @code{java-ngs}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| For Java packages containing a single class or a small class hierarchy,
 | ||
| we use the lowercase class name, replace all occurrences of @code{.} by
 | ||
| dashes and prepend the prefix @code{java-}.  So the class
 | ||
| @code{apache.commons.cli} becomes package
 | ||
| @code{java-apache-commons-cli}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Fonts
 | ||
| @subsection Fonts
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex fonts
 | ||
| For fonts that are in general not installed by a user for typesetting
 | ||
| purposes, or that are distributed as part of a larger software package,
 | ||
| we rely on the general packaging rules for software; for instance, this
 | ||
| applies to the fonts delivered as part of the X.Org system or fonts that
 | ||
| are part of TeX Live.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| To make it easier for a user to search for fonts, names for other packages
 | ||
| containing only fonts are constructed as follows, independently of the
 | ||
| upstream package name.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The name of a package containing only one font family starts with
 | ||
| @code{font-}; it is followed by the foundry name and a dash @code{-}
 | ||
| if the foundry is known, and the font family name, in which spaces are
 | ||
| replaced by dashes (and as usual, all upper case letters are transformed
 | ||
| to lower case).
 | ||
| For example, the Gentium font family by SIL is packaged under the name
 | ||
| @code{font-sil-gentium}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| For a package containing several font families, the name of the collection
 | ||
| is used in the place of the font family name.
 | ||
| For instance, the Liberation fonts consist of three families,
 | ||
| Liberation Sans, Liberation Serif and Liberation Mono.
 | ||
| These could be packaged separately under the names
 | ||
| @code{font-liberation-sans} and so on; but as they are distributed together
 | ||
| under a common name, we prefer to package them together as
 | ||
| @code{font-liberation}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| In the case where several formats of the same font family or font collection
 | ||
| are packaged separately, a short form of the format, prepended by a dash,
 | ||
| is added to the package name.  We use @code{-ttf} for TrueType fonts,
 | ||
| @code{-otf} for OpenType fonts and @code{-type1} for PostScript Type 1
 | ||
| fonts.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Coding Style
 | ||
| @section Coding Style
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| In general our code follows the GNU Coding Standards (@pxref{Top,,,
 | ||
| standards, GNU Coding Standards}).  However, they do not say much about
 | ||
| Scheme, so here are some additional rules.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @menu
 | ||
| * Programming Paradigm::        How to compose your elements.
 | ||
| * Modules::                     Where to store your code?
 | ||
| * Data Types and Pattern Matching::  Implementing data structures.
 | ||
| * Formatting Code::             Writing conventions.
 | ||
| @end menu
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Programming Paradigm
 | ||
| @subsection Programming Paradigm
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Scheme code in Guix is written in a purely functional style.  One
 | ||
| exception is code that involves input/output, and procedures that
 | ||
| implement low-level concepts, such as the @code{memoize} procedure.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Modules
 | ||
| @subsection Modules
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Guile modules that are meant to be used on the builder side must live in
 | ||
| the @code{(guix build @dots{})} name space.  They must not refer to
 | ||
| other Guix or GNU modules.  However, it is OK for a ``host-side'' module
 | ||
| to use a build-side module.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Modules that deal with the broader GNU system should be in the
 | ||
| @code{(gnu @dots{})} name space rather than @code{(guix @dots{})}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Data Types and Pattern Matching
 | ||
| @subsection Data Types and Pattern Matching
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| The tendency in classical Lisp is to use lists to represent everything,
 | ||
| and then to browse them ``by hand'' using @code{car}, @code{cdr},
 | ||
| @code{cadr}, and co.  There are several problems with that style,
 | ||
| notably the fact that it is hard to read, error-prone, and a hindrance
 | ||
| to proper type error reports.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Guix code should define appropriate data types (for instance, using
 | ||
| @code{define-record-type*}) rather than abuse lists.  In addition, it
 | ||
| should use pattern matching, via Guile’s @code{(ice-9 match)} module,
 | ||
| especially when matching lists.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Formatting Code
 | ||
| @subsection Formatting Code
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex formatting code
 | ||
| @cindex coding style
 | ||
| When writing Scheme code, we follow common wisdom among Scheme
 | ||
| programmers.  In general, we follow the
 | ||
| @url{http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt, Riastradh's Lisp
 | ||
| Style Rules}.  This document happens to describe the conventions mostly
 | ||
| used in Guile’s code too.  It is very thoughtful and well written, so
 | ||
| please do read it.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Some special forms introduced in Guix, such as the @code{substitute*}
 | ||
| macro, have special indentation rules.  These are defined in the
 | ||
| @file{.dir-locals.el} file, which Emacs automatically uses.  Also note
 | ||
| that Emacs-Guix provides @code{guix-devel-mode} mode that indents and
 | ||
| highlights Guix code properly (@pxref{Development,,, emacs-guix, The
 | ||
| Emacs-Guix Reference Manual}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex indentation, of code
 | ||
| @cindex formatting, of code
 | ||
| If you do not use Emacs, please make sure to let your editor knows these
 | ||
| rules.  To automatically indent a package definition, you can also run:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| ./etc/indent-code.el gnu/packages/@var{file}.scm @var{package}
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @noindent
 | ||
| This automatically indents the definition of @var{package} in
 | ||
| @file{gnu/packages/@var{file}.scm} by running Emacs in batch mode.  To
 | ||
| indent a whole file, omit the second argument:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| ./etc/indent-code.el gnu/services/@var{file}.scm
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @cindex Vim, Scheme code editing
 | ||
| If you are editing code with Vim, we recommend that you run @code{:set
 | ||
| autoindent} so that your code is automatically indented as you type.
 | ||
| Additionally,
 | ||
| @uref{https://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3998,
 | ||
| @code{paredit.vim}} may help you deal with all these parentheses.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| We require all top-level procedures to carry a docstring.  This
 | ||
| requirement can be relaxed for simple private procedures in the
 | ||
| @code{(guix build @dots{})} name space, though.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Procedures should not have more than four positional parameters.  Use
 | ||
| keyword parameters for procedures that take more than four parameters.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @node Submitting Patches
 | ||
| @section Submitting Patches
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Development is done using the Git distributed version control system.
 | ||
| Thus, access to the repository is not strictly necessary.  We welcome
 | ||
| contributions in the form of patches as produced by @code{git
 | ||
| format-patch} sent to the @email{guix-patches@@gnu.org} mailing list.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| This mailing list is backed by a Debbugs instance accessible at
 | ||
| @uref{https://bugs.gnu.org/guix-patches}, which allows us to keep track
 | ||
| of submissions.  Each message sent to that mailing list gets a new
 | ||
| tracking number assigned; people can then follow up on the submission by
 | ||
| sending email to @code{@var{NNN}@@debbugs.gnu.org}, where @var{NNN} is
 | ||
| the tracking number (@pxref{Sending a Patch Series}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Please write commit logs in the ChangeLog format (@pxref{Change Logs,,,
 | ||
| standards, GNU Coding Standards}); you can check the commit history for
 | ||
| examples.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Before submitting a patch that adds or modifies a package definition,
 | ||
| please run through this check list:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @enumerate
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| If the authors of the packaged software provide a cryptographic
 | ||
| signature for the release tarball, make an effort to verify the
 | ||
| authenticity of the archive.  For a detached GPG signature file this
 | ||
| would be done with the @code{gpg --verify} command.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Take some time to provide an adequate synopsis and description for the
 | ||
| package.  @xref{Synopses and Descriptions}, for some guidelines.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Run @code{guix lint @var{package}}, where @var{package} is the
 | ||
| name of the new or modified package, and fix any errors it reports
 | ||
| (@pxref{Invoking guix lint}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Make sure the package builds on your platform, using @code{guix build
 | ||
| @var{package}}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| We recommend you also try building the package on other supported
 | ||
| platforms.  As you may not have access to actual hardware platforms, we
 | ||
| recommend using the @code{qemu-binfmt-service-type} to emulate them.  In
 | ||
| order to enable it, add the following service to the list of services in
 | ||
| your @code{operating-system} configuration:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| (service qemu-binfmt-service-type
 | ||
|  (qemu-binfmt-configuration
 | ||
|    (platforms (lookup-qemu-platforms "arm" "aarch64" "mips64el"))
 | ||
|    (guix-support? #t)))
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Then reconfigure your system.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| You can then build packages for different platforms by specifying the
 | ||
| @code{--system} option.  For example, to build the "hello" package for
 | ||
| the armhf, aarch64, or mips64 architectures, you would run the following
 | ||
| commands, respectively:
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| guix build --system=armhf-linux --rounds=2 hello
 | ||
| guix build --system=aarch64-linux --rounds=2 hello
 | ||
| guix build --system=mips64el-linux --rounds=2 hello
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| @cindex bundling
 | ||
| Make sure the package does not use bundled copies of software already
 | ||
| available as separate packages.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Sometimes, packages include copies of the source code of their
 | ||
| dependencies as a convenience for users.  However, as a distribution, we
 | ||
| want to make sure that such packages end up using the copy we already
 | ||
| have in the distribution, if there is one.  This improves resource usage
 | ||
| (the dependency is built and stored only once), and allows the
 | ||
| distribution to make transverse changes such as applying security
 | ||
| updates for a given software package in a single place and have them
 | ||
| affect the whole system---something that bundled copies prevent.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Take a look at the profile reported by @command{guix size}
 | ||
| (@pxref{Invoking guix size}).  This will allow you to notice references
 | ||
| to other packages unwillingly retained.  It may also help determine
 | ||
| whether to split the package (@pxref{Packages with Multiple Outputs}),
 | ||
| and which optional dependencies should be used.  In particular, avoid adding
 | ||
| @code{texlive} as a dependency: because of its extreme size, use
 | ||
| @code{texlive-tiny} or @code{texlive-union} instead.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| For important changes, check that dependent package (if applicable) are
 | ||
| not affected by the change; @code{guix refresh --list-dependent
 | ||
| @var{package}} will help you do that (@pxref{Invoking guix refresh}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @c See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html>.
 | ||
| @cindex branching strategy
 | ||
| @cindex rebuild scheduling strategy
 | ||
| Depending on the number of dependent packages and thus the amount of
 | ||
| rebuilding induced, commits go to different branches, along these lines:
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @table @asis
 | ||
| @item 300 dependent packages or less
 | ||
| @code{master} branch (non-disruptive changes).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item between 300 and 1,200 dependent packages
 | ||
| @code{staging} branch (non-disruptive changes).  This branch is intended
 | ||
| to be merged in @code{master} every 3 weeks or so.  Topical changes
 | ||
| (e.g., an update of the GNOME stack) can instead go to a specific branch
 | ||
| (say, @code{gnome-updates}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item more than 1,200 dependent packages
 | ||
| @code{core-updates} branch (may include major and potentially disruptive
 | ||
| changes).  This branch is intended to be merged in @code{master} every
 | ||
| 2.5 months or so.
 | ||
| @end table
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| All these branches are @uref{https://hydra.gnu.org/project/gnu,
 | ||
| tracked by our build farm} and merged into @code{master} once
 | ||
| everything has been successfully built.  This allows us to fix issues
 | ||
| before they hit users, and to reduce the window during which pre-built
 | ||
| binaries are not available.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Generally, branches other than @code{master} are considered
 | ||
| @emph{frozen} if there has been a recent evaluation, or there is a
 | ||
| corresponding @code{-next} branch.  Please ask on the mailing list or
 | ||
| IRC if unsure where to place a patch.
 | ||
| @c TODO: It would be good with badges on the website that tracks these
 | ||
| @c branches.  Or maybe even a status page.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| @cindex determinism, of build processes
 | ||
| @cindex reproducible builds, checking
 | ||
| Check whether the package's build process is deterministic.  This
 | ||
| typically means checking whether an independent build of the package
 | ||
| yields the exact same result that you obtained, bit for bit.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| A simple way to do that is by building the same package several times in
 | ||
| a row on your machine (@pxref{Invoking guix build}):
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @example
 | ||
| guix build --rounds=2 my-package
 | ||
| @end example
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| This is enough to catch a class of common non-determinism issues, such
 | ||
| as timestamps or randomly-generated output in the build result.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Another option is to use @command{guix challenge} (@pxref{Invoking guix
 | ||
| challenge}).  You may run it once the package has been committed and
 | ||
| built by @code{@value{SUBSTITUTE-SERVER}} to check whether it obtains the same
 | ||
| result as you did.  Better yet: Find another machine that can build it
 | ||
| and run @command{guix publish}.  Since the remote build machine is
 | ||
| likely different from yours, this can catch non-determinism issues
 | ||
| related to the hardware---e.g., use of different instruction set
 | ||
| extensions---or to the operating system kernel---e.g., reliance on
 | ||
| @code{uname} or @file{/proc} files.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| When writing documentation, please use gender-neutral wording when
 | ||
| referring to people, such as
 | ||
| @uref{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they, singular
 | ||
| ``they''@comma{} ``their''@comma{} ``them''}, and so forth.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Verify that your patch contains only one set of related changes.
 | ||
| Bundling unrelated changes together makes reviewing harder and slower.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| Examples of unrelated changes include the addition of several packages,
 | ||
| or a package update along with fixes to that package.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| Please follow our code formatting rules, possibly running the
 | ||
| @command{etc/indent-code.el} script to do that automatically for you
 | ||
| (@pxref{Formatting Code}).
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @item
 | ||
| When possible, use mirrors in the source URL (@pxref{Invoking guix download}).
 | ||
| Use reliable URLs, not generated ones.  For instance, GitHub archives are not
 | ||
| necessarily identical from one generation to the next, so in this case it's
 | ||
| often better to clone the repository.  Don't use the @command{name} field in
 | ||
| the URL: it is not very useful and if the name changes, the URL will probably
 | ||
| be wrong.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @end enumerate
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| When posting a patch to the mailing list, use @samp{[PATCH] @dots{}} as
 | ||
| a subject.  You may use your email client or the @command{git
 | ||
| send-email} command (@pxref{Sending a Patch Series}).  We prefer to get
 | ||
| patches in plain text messages, either inline or as MIME attachments.
 | ||
| You are advised to pay attention if your email client changes anything
 | ||
| like line breaks or indentation which could potentially break the
 | ||
| patches.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| When a bug is resolved, please close the thread by sending an email to
 | ||
| @email{@var{NNN}-done@@debbugs.gnu.org}.
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| @unnumberedsubsec Sending a Patch Series
 | ||
| @anchor{Sending a Patch Series}
 | ||
| @cindex patch series
 | ||
| @cindex @code{git send-email}
 | ||
| @cindex @code{git-send-email}
 | ||
| 
 | ||
| When sending a patch series (e.g., using @code{git send-email}), please
 | ||
| first send one message to @email{guix-patches@@gnu.org}, and then send
 | ||
| subsequent patches to @email{@var{NNN}@@debbugs.gnu.org} to make sure
 | ||
| they are kept together.  See
 | ||
| @uref{https://debbugs.gnu.org/Advanced.html, the Debbugs documentation}
 | ||
| for more information.
 | ||
| @c Debbugs bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/db/15/15361.html
 |