2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Contributing
|
|
|
|
|
@chapter Contributing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This project is a cooperative effort, and we need your help to make it
|
|
|
|
|
grow! Please get in touch with us on @email{guix-devel@@gnu.org} and
|
2021-05-19 23:56:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{#guix} on the Libera Chat IRC network. We welcome ideas, bug
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
reports, patches, and anything that may be helpful to the project. We
|
|
|
|
|
particularly welcome help on packaging (@pxref{Packaging Guidelines}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-09 12:39:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex code of conduct, of contributors
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex contributor covenant
|
2015-12-09 17:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
We want to provide a warm, friendly, and harassment-free environment, so
|
|
|
|
|
that anyone can contribute to the best of their abilities. To this end
|
|
|
|
|
our project uses a ``Contributor Covenant'', which was adapted from
|
2020-03-09 08:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://contributor-covenant.org/}. You can find a local version in
|
2015-12-09 17:29:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the @file{CODE-OF-CONDUCT} file in the source tree.
|
2015-12-09 12:39:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-24 17:00:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Contributors are not required to use their legal name in patches and
|
|
|
|
|
on-line communication; they can use any name or pseudonym of their
|
|
|
|
|
choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Building from Git:: The latest and greatest.
|
|
|
|
|
* Running Guix Before It Is Installed:: Hacker tricks.
|
|
|
|
|
* The Perfect Setup:: The right tools.
|
2023-09-25 14:16:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Alternative Setups:: Other posible tools that do the job.
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Packaging Guidelines:: Growing the distribution.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Coding Style:: Hygiene of the contributor.
|
|
|
|
|
* Submitting Patches:: Share your work.
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Tracking Bugs and Changes:: Keeping it all organized.
|
2020-01-01 15:14:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Commit Access:: Pushing to the official repository.
|
2023-10-10 12:49:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Reviewing the Work of Others:: Some guidelines for sharing reviews.
|
2020-10-10 04:33:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Updating the Guix Package:: Updating the Guix package definition.
|
2022-01-15 19:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Writing Documentation:: Improving documentation in GNU Guix.
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Translating Guix:: Make Guix speak your native language.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Building from Git
|
|
|
|
|
@section Building from Git
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to hack Guix itself, it is recommended to use the latest
|
2017-07-20 15:05:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
version from the Git repository:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-27 12:52:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex authentication, of a Guix checkout
|
|
|
|
|
How do you ensure that you obtained a genuine copy of the repository?
|
2020-08-10 09:20:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
To do that, run @command{guix git authenticate}, passing it the commit
|
2020-07-22 13:04:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and OpenPGP fingerprint of the @dfn{channel introduction}
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Invoking guix git authenticate}):
|
2019-12-27 12:52:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-22 13:04:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@c The commit and fingerprint below must match those of the channel
|
|
|
|
|
@c introduction in '%default-channels'.
|
2019-12-27 12:52:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2020-08-10 09:20:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
git fetch origin keyring:keyring
|
2020-07-22 13:04:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
guix git authenticate 9edb3f66fd807b096b48283debdcddccfea34bad \
|
|
|
|
|
"BBB0 2DDF 2CEA F6A8 0D1D E643 A2A0 6DF2 A33A 54FA"
|
2019-12-27 12:52:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
2020-07-22 13:04:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This command completes with exit code zero on success; it prints an
|
|
|
|
|
error message and exits with a non-zero code otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you can see, there is a chicken-and-egg problem: you first need to
|
|
|
|
|
have Guix installed. Typically you would install Guix System
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{System Installation}) or Guix on top of another distro
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Binary Installation}); in either case, you would verify the
|
|
|
|
|
OpenPGP signature on the installation medium. This ``bootstraps'' the
|
|
|
|
|
trust chain.
|
2019-12-27 12:52:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-22 10:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to set up a development environment for Guix is, of
|
|
|
|
|
course, by using Guix! The following command starts a new shell where
|
|
|
|
|
all the dependencies and appropriate environment variables are set up to
|
|
|
|
|
hack on Guix:
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-22 10:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2021-10-01 13:19:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
guix shell -D guix --pure
|
2015-11-22 10:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-21 18:57:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
or even, from within a Git worktree for Guix:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix shell --pure
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-01 13:19:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@xref{Invoking guix shell}, for more information on that command.
|
2019-07-13 06:29:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are unable to use Guix when building Guix from a checkout, the
|
|
|
|
|
following are the required packages in addition to those mentioned in the
|
|
|
|
|
installation instructions (@pxref{Requirements}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
2020-03-10 12:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item @url{https://gnu.org/software/autoconf/, GNU Autoconf};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{https://gnu.org/software/automake/, GNU Automake};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{https://gnu.org/software/gettext/, GNU Gettext};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{https://gnu.org/software/texinfo/, GNU Texinfo};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{https://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz};
|
|
|
|
|
@item @url{https://www.gnu.org/software/help2man/, GNU Help2man (optional)}.
|
2019-07-13 06:29:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Guix, extra dependencies can be added by instead running @command{guix
|
2021-10-01 13:19:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
shell}:
|
2015-11-22 10:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2021-10-01 13:19:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
guix shell -D guix help2man git strace --pure
|
2015-11-22 10:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-15 09:29:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
From there you can generate the build system infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
using Autoconf and Automake:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
./bootstrap
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you get an error like this one:
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
configure.ac:46: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_CHECK_MODULES
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-22 10:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
it probably means that Autoconf couldn’t find @file{pkg.m4}, which is
|
2015-11-22 10:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
provided by pkg-config. Make sure that @file{pkg.m4} is available. The
|
|
|
|
|
same holds for the @file{guile.m4} set of macros provided by Guile. For
|
|
|
|
|
instance, if you installed Automake in @file{/usr/local}, it wouldn’t
|
|
|
|
|
look for @file{.m4} files in @file{/usr/share}. In that case, you have
|
|
|
|
|
to invoke the following command:
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
export ACLOCAL_PATH=/usr/share/aclocal
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-21 20:43:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@xref{Macro Search Path,,, automake, The GNU Automake Manual}, for
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-15 09:29:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Then, run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-04-24 19:59:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
./configure --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc
|
2022-02-15 09:29:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
... where @file{/var} is the normal @code{localstatedir} value
|
2023-05-08 01:28:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{The Store}, for information about this) and @file{/etc} is the
|
|
|
|
|
normal @code{sysconfdir} value. Note that you will probably not run
|
|
|
|
|
@command{make install} at the end (you don't have to) but it's still
|
|
|
|
|
important to pass the right @code{localstatedir} and @code{sysconfdir}
|
|
|
|
|
values, which get recorded in the @code{(guix config)} Guile module.
|
2022-02-15 09:29:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, you can build Guix and, if you feel so inclined, run the tests
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Running the Test Suite}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
make
|
|
|
|
|
make check
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
If anything fails, take a look at installation instructions
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Installation}) or send a message to the
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org, mailing list}.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-15 12:12:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
From there on, you can authenticate all the commits included in your
|
|
|
|
|
checkout by running:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
make authenticate
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first run takes a couple of minutes, but subsequent runs are faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-24 12:35:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Or, when your configuration for your local Git repository doesn't match
|
|
|
|
|
the default one, you can provide the reference for the @code{keyring}
|
|
|
|
|
branch through the variable @code{GUIX_GIT_KEYRING}. The following
|
|
|
|
|
example assumes that you have a Git remote called @samp{myremote}
|
|
|
|
|
pointing to the official repository:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
make authenticate GUIX_GIT_KEYRING=myremote/keyring
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-15 12:12:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@quotation Note
|
|
|
|
|
You are advised to run @command{make authenticate} after every
|
|
|
|
|
@command{git pull} invocation. This ensures you keep receiving valid
|
|
|
|
|
changes to the repository.
|
|
|
|
|
@end quotation
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-16 06:46:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
After updating the repository, @command{make} might fail with an error
|
|
|
|
|
similar to the following example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-11-04 19:55:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
error: failed to load 'gnu/packages/linux.scm':
|
2021-12-16 06:46:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
ice-9/eval.scm:293:34: In procedure abi-check: #<record-type <origin>>: record ABI mismatch; recompilation needed
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that one of the record types that Guix defines (in this
|
|
|
|
|
example, the @code{origin} record) has changed, and all of guix needs
|
|
|
|
|
to be recompiled to take that change into account. To do so, run
|
|
|
|
|
@command{make clean-go} followed by @command{make}.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Running Guix Before It Is Installed
|
|
|
|
|
@section Running Guix Before It Is Installed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to keep a sane working environment, you will find it useful to
|
|
|
|
|
test the changes made in your local source tree checkout without
|
|
|
|
|
actually installing them. So that you can distinguish between your
|
|
|
|
|
``end-user'' hat and your ``motley'' costume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To that end, all the command-line tools can be used even if you have not
|
2020-12-15 11:33:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
run @code{make install}. To do that, you first need to have an
|
|
|
|
|
environment with all the dependencies available (@pxref{Building from
|
|
|
|
|
Git}), and then simply prefix each command with @command{./pre-inst-env}
|
2023-09-11 16:56:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(the @file{pre-inst-env} script lives in the top build tree of Guix;
|
|
|
|
|
@pxref{Building from Git} to generate it). As an example, here is how you
|
|
|
|
|
would build the @code{hello} package as defined in your working tree (this
|
|
|
|
|
assumes @command{guix-daemon} is already running on your system; it's OK if
|
|
|
|
|
it's a different version):
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build hello
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
2019-07-13 06:29:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Similarly, an example for a Guile session using the Guix modules:
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ ./pre-inst-env guile -c '(use-modules (guix utils)) (pk (%current-system))'
|
2015-10-26 17:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;;; ("x86_64-linux")
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex REPL
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex read-eval-print loop
|
2022-07-15 15:27:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@dots{} and for a REPL (@pxref{Using Guix Interactively}):
|
2015-10-26 17:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ ./pre-inst-env guile
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> ,use(guix)
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> ,use(gnu)
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> (define snakes
|
|
|
|
|
(fold-packages
|
|
|
|
|
(lambda (package lst)
|
|
|
|
|
(if (string-prefix? "python"
|
|
|
|
|
(package-name package))
|
|
|
|
|
(cons package lst)
|
|
|
|
|
lst))
|
|
|
|
|
'()))
|
|
|
|
|
scheme@@(guile-user)> (length snakes)
|
|
|
|
|
$1 = 361
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-08 07:57:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you are hacking on the daemon and its supporting code or if
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix-daemon} is not already running on your system, you can
|
|
|
|
|
launch it straight from the build tree@footnote{The @option{-E} flag to
|
|
|
|
|
@command{sudo} guarantees that @code{GUILE_LOAD_PATH} is correctly set
|
|
|
|
|
such that @command{guix-daemon} and the tools it uses can find the Guile
|
|
|
|
|
modules they need.}:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ sudo -E ./pre-inst-env guix-daemon --build-users-group=guixbuild
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The @command{pre-inst-env} script sets up all the environment variables
|
|
|
|
|
necessary to support this, including @env{PATH} and @env{GUILE_LOAD_PATH}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-11-02 15:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Note that @command{./pre-inst-env guix pull} does @emph{not} upgrade the
|
2018-05-30 15:50:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
local source tree; it simply updates the @file{~/.config/guix/current}
|
2015-11-02 15:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
symlink (@pxref{Invoking guix pull}). Run @command{git pull} instead if
|
2018-05-30 15:50:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
you want to upgrade your local source tree.
|
2015-11-02 15:34:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-16 06:46:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, especially if you have recently updated your repository,
|
|
|
|
|
running @command{./pre-inst-env} will print a message similar to the
|
|
|
|
|
following example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
;;; note: source file /home/user/projects/guix/guix/progress.scm
|
|
|
|
|
;;; newer than compiled /home/user/projects/guix/guix/progress.go
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is only a note and you can safely ignore it. You can get rid of
|
|
|
|
|
the message by running @command{make -j4}. Until you do, Guile will run
|
|
|
|
|
slightly slower because it will interpret the code instead of using
|
|
|
|
|
prepared Guile object (@file{.go}) files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can run @command{make} automatically as you work using
|
|
|
|
|
@command{watchexec} from the @code{watchexec} package. For example,
|
2022-07-05 16:35:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
to build again each time you update a package file, run
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{watchexec -w gnu/packages -- make -j4}.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node The Perfect Setup
|
|
|
|
|
@section The Perfect Setup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Perfect Setup to hack on Guix is basically the perfect setup used
|
|
|
|
|
for Guile hacking (@pxref{Using Guile in Emacs,,, guile, Guile Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Manual}). First, you need more than an editor, you need
|
2020-03-10 12:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs, Emacs}, empowered by the
|
|
|
|
|
wonderful @url{https://nongnu.org/geiser/, Geiser}. To set that up, run:
|
2019-02-03 17:35:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2022-07-15 15:27:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
guix install emacs guile emacs-geiser emacs-geiser-guile
|
2019-02-03 17:35:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geiser allows for interactive and incremental development from within
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs: code compilation and evaluation from within buffers, access to
|
|
|
|
|
on-line documentation (docstrings), context-sensitive completion,
|
|
|
|
|
@kbd{M-.} to jump to an object definition, a REPL to try out your code,
|
2023-09-06 17:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and more (@pxref{Introduction,,, geiser, Geiser User Manual}). If you
|
|
|
|
|
allow Emacs to load the @file{.dir-locals.el} file at the root of the
|
|
|
|
|
project checkout, it will cause Geiser to automatically add the local
|
|
|
|
|
Guix sources to the Guile load path.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To actually edit the code, Emacs already has a neat Scheme mode. But in
|
|
|
|
|
addition to that, you must not miss
|
2020-01-18 11:52:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ParEdit, Paredit}. It provides
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
facilities to directly operate on the syntax tree, such as raising an
|
|
|
|
|
s-expression or wrapping it, swallowing or rejecting the following
|
|
|
|
|
s-expression, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-15 22:10:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex templates
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex reducing boilerplate
|
|
|
|
|
We also provide templates for common git commit messages and package
|
|
|
|
|
definitions in the @file{etc/snippets} directory. These templates can
|
2022-08-12 08:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
be used to expand short trigger strings to interactive text snippets. If
|
|
|
|
|
you use @url{https://joaotavora.github.io/yasnippet/, YASnippet}, you
|
|
|
|
|
may want to add the @file{etc/snippets/yas} snippets directory to the
|
|
|
|
|
@var{yas-snippet-dirs} variable. If you use
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://github.com/minad/tempel/, Tempel}, you may want to add the
|
|
|
|
|
@file{etc/snippets/tempel/*} path to the @var{tempel-path} variable in
|
2017-12-15 22:10:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Emacs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
;; @r{Assuming the Guix checkout is in ~/src/guix.}
|
2022-08-12 08:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
;; @r{Yasnippet configuration}
|
2017-12-15 22:10:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(with-eval-after-load 'yasnippet
|
2022-08-12 08:58:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(add-to-list 'yas-snippet-dirs "~/src/guix/etc/snippets/yas"))
|
|
|
|
|
;; @r{Tempel configuration}
|
|
|
|
|
(with-eval-after-load 'tempel
|
|
|
|
|
;; Ensure tempel-path is a list -- it may also be a string.
|
|
|
|
|
(unless (listp 'tempel-path)
|
|
|
|
|
(setq tempel-path (list tempel-path)))
|
|
|
|
|
(add-to-list 'tempel-path "~/src/guix/etc/snippets/tempel/*"))
|
2017-12-15 22:10:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The commit message snippets depend on @url{https://magit.vc/, Magit} to
|
|
|
|
|
display staged files. When editing a commit message type @code{add}
|
|
|
|
|
followed by @kbd{TAB} to insert a commit message template for adding a
|
|
|
|
|
package; type @code{update} followed by @kbd{TAB} to insert a template
|
2018-07-05 11:42:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
for updating a package; type @code{https} followed by @kbd{TAB} to
|
|
|
|
|
insert a template for changing the home page URI of a package to HTTPS.
|
2017-12-15 22:10:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main snippet for @code{scheme-mode} is triggered by typing
|
|
|
|
|
@code{package...} followed by @kbd{TAB}. This snippet also inserts the
|
|
|
|
|
trigger string @code{origin...}, which can be expanded further. The
|
|
|
|
|
@code{origin} snippet in turn may insert other trigger strings ending on
|
|
|
|
|
@code{...}, which also can be expanded further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-22 14:54:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex insert or update copyright
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{M-x guix-copyright}
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{M-x copyright-update}
|
2020-07-09 14:49:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
We additionally provide insertion and automatic update of a copyright in
|
2020-02-22 14:54:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@file{etc/copyright.el}. You may want to set your full name, mail, and
|
|
|
|
|
load a file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(setq user-full-name "Alice Doe")
|
|
|
|
|
(setq user-mail-address "alice@@mail.org")
|
|
|
|
|
;; @r{Assuming the Guix checkout is in ~/src/guix.}
|
|
|
|
|
(load-file "~/src/guix/etc/copyright.el")
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To insert a copyright at the current line invoke @code{M-x guix-copyright}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To update a copyright you need to specify a @code{copyright-names-regexp}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(setq copyright-names-regexp
|
|
|
|
|
(format "%s <%s>" user-full-name user-mail-address))
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can check if your copyright is up to date by evaluating @code{M-x
|
|
|
|
|
copyright-update}. If you want to do it automatically after each buffer
|
|
|
|
|
save then add @code{(add-hook 'after-save-hook 'copyright-update)} in
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-19 00:30:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Viewing Bugs within Emacs
|
2023-09-12 02:31:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsection Viewing Bugs within Emacs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs has a nice minor mode called @code{bug-reference}, which, when
|
|
|
|
|
combined with @samp{emacs-debbugs} (the Emacs package), can be used to
|
|
|
|
|
open links such as @samp{<https://bugs.gnu.org/58697>} or
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58697>} as bug report buffers. From
|
|
|
|
|
there you can easily consult the email thread via the Gnus interface,
|
|
|
|
|
reply or modify the bug status, all without leaving the comfort of
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs! Below is a sample configuration to add to your @file{~/.emacs}
|
|
|
|
|
configuration file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
;;; Bug references.
|
2023-09-26 18:02:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(require 'bug-reference)
|
2023-09-12 02:31:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(add-hook 'prog-mode-hook #'bug-reference-prog-mode)
|
|
|
|
|
(add-hook 'gnus-mode-hook #'bug-reference-mode)
|
|
|
|
|
(add-hook 'erc-mode-hook #'bug-reference-mode)
|
2023-09-26 18:02:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(add-hook 'gnus-summary-mode-hook #'bug-reference-mode)
|
|
|
|
|
(add-hook 'gnus-article-mode-hook #'bug-reference-mode)
|
2023-09-12 02:31:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;;; This extends the default expression (the top-most, first expression
|
|
|
|
|
;;; provided to 'or') to also match URLs such as
|
|
|
|
|
;;; <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58697> or <https://bugs.gnu.org/58697>.
|
|
|
|
|
;;; It is also extended to detect "Fixes: #NNNNN" git trailers.
|
|
|
|
|
(setq bug-reference-bug-regexp
|
|
|
|
|
(rx (group (or (seq word-boundary
|
|
|
|
|
(or (seq (char "Bb") "ug"
|
|
|
|
|
(zero-or-one " ")
|
|
|
|
|
(zero-or-one "#"))
|
|
|
|
|
(seq (char "Pp") "atch"
|
|
|
|
|
(zero-or-one " ")
|
|
|
|
|
"#")
|
|
|
|
|
(seq (char "Ff") "ixes"
|
|
|
|
|
(zero-or-one ":")
|
|
|
|
|
(zero-or-one " ") "#")
|
|
|
|
|
(seq "RFE"
|
|
|
|
|
(zero-or-one " ") "#")
|
|
|
|
|
(seq "PR "
|
|
|
|
|
(one-or-more (char "a-z+-")) "/"))
|
|
|
|
|
(group (one-or-more (char "0-9"))
|
|
|
|
|
(zero-or-one
|
|
|
|
|
(seq "#" (one-or-more
|
|
|
|
|
(char "0-9"))))))
|
2023-10-04 20:39:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(seq (? "<") "https://bugs.gnu.org/"
|
2023-09-12 02:31:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(group-n 2 (one-or-more (char "0-9")))
|
2023-10-04 20:39:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(? ">"))
|
|
|
|
|
(seq (? "<") "https://issues.guix.gnu.org/"
|
|
|
|
|
(? "issue/")
|
|
|
|
|
(group-n 2 (one-or-more (char "0-9")))
|
|
|
|
|
(? ">"))))))
|
2023-09-26 18:02:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(setq bug-reference-url-format "https://issues.guix.gnu.org/%s")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(require 'debbugs)
|
|
|
|
|
(require 'debbugs-browse)
|
|
|
|
|
(add-hook 'bug-reference-mode-hook #'debbugs-browse-mode)
|
|
|
|
|
(add-hook 'bug-reference-prog-mode-hook #'debbugs-browse-mode)
|
2023-09-12 02:31:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;; The following allows Emacs Debbugs user to open the issue directly within
|
|
|
|
|
;; Emacs.
|
|
|
|
|
(setq debbugs-browse-url-regexp
|
|
|
|
|
(rx line-start
|
|
|
|
|
"http" (zero-or-one "s") "://"
|
|
|
|
|
(or "debbugs" "issues.guix" "bugs")
|
|
|
|
|
".gnu.org" (one-or-more "/")
|
|
|
|
|
(group (zero-or-one "cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug="))
|
|
|
|
|
(group-n 3 (one-or-more digit))
|
|
|
|
|
line-end))
|
2023-10-19 00:30:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;; Reduce the number of prompts with 'M-x debbugs-gnu'.
|
|
|
|
|
(setq debbugs-gnu-default-packages '("guix" "guix-patches"))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;; Show feature requests.
|
|
|
|
|
(setq debbugs-gnu-default-severities
|
|
|
|
|
'("serious" "important" "normal" "minor" "wishlist"))
|
2023-09-12 02:31:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information, refer to @ref{Bug Reference,,, emacs, The GNU
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs Manual} and @ref{Minor Mode,,, debbugs-ug, The Debbugs User
|
|
|
|
|
Guide}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-25 14:16:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Alternative Setups
|
|
|
|
|
@section Alternative Setups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative setups than Emacs may let you work on Guix with a
|
|
|
|
|
similar development experience and they might work better with the
|
|
|
|
|
tools you currently use or help you make the transition to Emacs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The options listed below only provide the alternatives to the Emacs
|
|
|
|
|
based setup, which is the most widely used in the Guix community. If
|
|
|
|
|
you want to really understand how is the perfect setup for Guix
|
|
|
|
|
development supposed to work, we encourage you to read the section
|
|
|
|
|
before this regardless the editor you choose to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Guile Studio:: First step in your transition to Emacs.
|
|
|
|
|
* Vim and NeoVim:: When you are evil to the root.
|
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Guile Studio
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Guile Studio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guile Studio is a pre-configured Emacs with mostly everything you need
|
|
|
|
|
to start hacking in Guile. If you are not familiar with Emacs it makes
|
|
|
|
|
the transition easier for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix install guile-studio
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guile Studio comes with Geiser preinstalled and prepared for action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Vim and NeoVim
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Vim and NeoVim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vim (and NeoVim) are also packaged in Guix, just in case you decided
|
|
|
|
|
to go for the evil path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix install vim
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to enjoy a similar development experience to that in the perfect
|
|
|
|
|
setup, you should install several plugins to configure the editor. Vim (and
|
|
|
|
|
NeoVim) have the equivalent to Paredit,
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3998,
|
|
|
|
|
@code{paredit.vim}}, that will help you with the structural editing of Scheme
|
|
|
|
|
files (the support for very large files is not great, though).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix install vim-paredit
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also recommend that you run @code{:set autoindent} so that your code is
|
|
|
|
|
automatically indented as you type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the interaction with Git,
|
2023-11-19 21:46:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2975,
|
2023-09-25 14:16:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{fugitive.vim}} is the most commonly used plugin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix install vim-fugitive
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And of course if you want to interact with Guix directly from inside of
|
|
|
|
|
vim, using the built-in terminal emulator, we have our very own
|
|
|
|
|
@code{guix.vim} package!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix install vim-guix-vim
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In NeoVim you can even make a similar setup to Geiser using
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://conjure.fun/, Conjure} that lets you connect to a running Guile
|
|
|
|
|
process and inject your code there live (sadly it's not packaged in Guix yet).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Packaging Guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
@section Packaging Guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex packages, creating
|
|
|
|
|
The GNU distribution is nascent and may well lack some of your favorite
|
|
|
|
|
packages. This section describes how you can help make the distribution
|
|
|
|
|
grow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free software packages are usually distributed in the form of
|
|
|
|
|
@dfn{source code tarballs}---typically @file{tar.gz} files that contain
|
|
|
|
|
all the source files. Adding a package to the distribution means
|
|
|
|
|
essentially two things: adding a @dfn{recipe} that describes how to
|
|
|
|
|
build the package, including a list of other packages required to build
|
|
|
|
|
it, and adding @dfn{package metadata} along with that recipe, such as a
|
|
|
|
|
description and licensing information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Guix all this information is embodied in @dfn{package definitions}.
|
|
|
|
|
Package definitions provide a high-level view of the package. They are
|
|
|
|
|
written using the syntax of the Scheme programming language; in fact,
|
|
|
|
|
for each package we define a variable bound to the package definition,
|
|
|
|
|
and export that variable from a module (@pxref{Package Modules}).
|
|
|
|
|
However, in-depth Scheme knowledge is @emph{not} a prerequisite for
|
|
|
|
|
creating packages. For more information on package definitions,
|
|
|
|
|
@pxref{Defining Packages}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a package definition is in place, stored in a file in the Guix
|
|
|
|
|
source tree, it can be tested using the @command{guix build} command
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Invoking guix build}). For example, assuming the new package is
|
|
|
|
|
called @code{gnew}, you may run this command from the Guix build tree
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Running Guix Before It Is Installed}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guix build gnew --keep-failed
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using @code{--keep-failed} makes it easier to debug build failures since
|
|
|
|
|
it provides access to the failed build tree. Another useful
|
|
|
|
|
command-line option when debugging is @code{--log-file}, to access the
|
|
|
|
|
build log.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the package is unknown to the @command{guix} command, it may be that
|
|
|
|
|
the source file contains a syntax error, or lacks a @code{define-public}
|
|
|
|
|
clause to export the package variable. To figure it out, you may load
|
|
|
|
|
the module from Guile to get more information about the actual error:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guile -c '(use-modules (gnu packages gnew))'
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once your package builds correctly, please send us a patch
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Submitting Patches}). Well, if you need help, we will be happy to
|
|
|
|
|
help you too. Once the patch is committed in the Guix repository, the
|
|
|
|
|
new package automatically gets built on the supported platforms by
|
2021-05-15 10:02:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://@value{SUBSTITUTE-SERVER-1}, our continuous integration system}.
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex substituter
|
|
|
|
|
Users can obtain the new package definition simply by running
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix pull} (@pxref{Invoking guix pull}). When
|
2021-05-15 10:02:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{@value{SUBSTITUTE-SERVER-1}} is done building the package, installing the
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
package automatically downloads binaries from there
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Substitutes}). The only place where human intervention is
|
|
|
|
|
needed is to review and apply the patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Software Freedom:: What may go into the distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
* Package Naming:: What's in a name?
|
|
|
|
|
* Version Numbers:: When the name is not enough.
|
|
|
|
|
* Synopses and Descriptions:: Helping users find the right package.
|
2020-09-11 18:08:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Snippets versus Phases:: Whether to use a snippet, or a build phase.
|
2023-10-22 01:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Cyclic Module Dependencies:: Going full circle.
|
2020-12-16 19:31:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Emacs Packages:: Your Elisp fix.
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Python Modules:: A touch of British comedy.
|
|
|
|
|
* Perl Modules:: Little pearls.
|
|
|
|
|
* Java Packages:: Coffee break.
|
2020-02-17 09:21:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Rust Crates:: Beware of oxidation.
|
2022-05-18 18:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Elm Packages:: Trees of browser code
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Fonts:: Fond of fonts.
|
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Software Freedom
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Software Freedom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@c Adapted from http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html.
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex free software
|
|
|
|
|
The GNU operating system has been developed so that users can have
|
|
|
|
|
freedom in their computing. GNU is @dfn{free software}, meaning that
|
2020-03-10 12:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
users have the @url{https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html,four
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
essential freedoms}: to run the program, to study and change the program
|
|
|
|
|
in source code form, to redistribute exact copies, and to distribute
|
|
|
|
|
modified versions. Packages found in the GNU distribution provide only
|
|
|
|
|
software that conveys these four freedoms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the GNU distribution follow the
|
2020-03-10 12:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html,free
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
software distribution guidelines}. Among other things, these guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
reject non-free firmware, recommendations of non-free software, and
|
|
|
|
|
discuss ways to deal with trademarks and patents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some otherwise free upstream package sources contain a small and optional
|
|
|
|
|
subset that violates the above guidelines, for instance because this subset
|
|
|
|
|
is itself non-free code. When that happens, the offending items are removed
|
|
|
|
|
with appropriate patches or code snippets in the @code{origin} form of the
|
|
|
|
|
package (@pxref{Defining Packages}). This way, @code{guix
|
|
|
|
|
build --source} returns the ``freed'' source rather than the unmodified
|
|
|
|
|
upstream source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Package Naming
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Package Naming
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package name
|
2021-03-09 20:59:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A package actually has two names associated with it.
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
First, there is the name of the @emph{Scheme variable}, the one following
|
|
|
|
|
@code{define-public}. By this name, the package can be made known in the
|
|
|
|
|
Scheme code, for instance as input to another package. Second, there is
|
|
|
|
|
the string in the @code{name} field of a package definition. This name
|
|
|
|
|
is used by package management commands such as
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix package} and @command{guix build}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both are usually the same and correspond to the lowercase conversion of
|
|
|
|
|
the project name chosen upstream, with underscores replaced with
|
|
|
|
|
hyphens. For instance, GNUnet is available as @code{gnunet}, and
|
|
|
|
|
SDL_net as @code{sdl-net}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-09 21:41:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A noteworthy exception to this rule is when the project name is only a
|
|
|
|
|
single character, or if an older maintained project with the same name
|
|
|
|
|
already exists---regardless of whether it has already been packaged for
|
|
|
|
|
Guix. Use common sense to make such names unambiguous and meaningful.
|
|
|
|
|
For example, Guix's package for the shell called ``s'' upstream is
|
|
|
|
|
@code{s-shell} and @emph{not} @code{s}. Feel free to ask your fellow
|
|
|
|
|
hackers for inspiration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
We do not add @code{lib} prefixes for library packages, unless these are
|
|
|
|
|
already part of the official project name. But @pxref{Python
|
|
|
|
|
Modules} and @ref{Perl Modules} for special rules concerning modules for
|
|
|
|
|
the Python and Perl languages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Font package names are handled differently, @pxref{Fonts}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Version Numbers
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Version Numbers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package version
|
|
|
|
|
We usually package only the latest version of a given free software
|
|
|
|
|
project. But sometimes, for instance for incompatible library versions,
|
|
|
|
|
two (or more) versions of the same package are needed. These require
|
|
|
|
|
different Scheme variable names. We use the name as defined
|
|
|
|
|
in @ref{Package Naming}
|
|
|
|
|
for the most recent version; previous versions use the same name, suffixed
|
|
|
|
|
by @code{-} and the smallest prefix of the version number that may
|
|
|
|
|
distinguish the two versions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name inside the package definition is the same for all versions of a
|
|
|
|
|
package and does not contain any version number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For instance, the versions 2.24.20 and 3.9.12 of GTK+ may be packaged as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(define-public gtk+
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "gtk+")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "3.9.12")
|
|
|
|
|
...))
|
|
|
|
|
(define-public gtk+-2
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "gtk+")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "2.24.20")
|
|
|
|
|
...))
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If we also wanted GTK+ 3.8.2, this would be packaged as
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(define-public gtk+-3.8
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "gtk+")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "3.8.2")
|
|
|
|
|
...))
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@c See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00425.html>,
|
|
|
|
|
@c for a discussion of what follows.
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex version number, for VCS snapshots
|
|
|
|
|
Occasionally, we package snapshots of upstream's version control system
|
|
|
|
|
(VCS) instead of formal releases. This should remain exceptional,
|
|
|
|
|
because it is up to upstream developers to clarify what the stable
|
|
|
|
|
release is. Yet, it is sometimes necessary. So, what should we put in
|
|
|
|
|
the @code{version} field?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly, we need to make the commit identifier of the VCS snapshot
|
|
|
|
|
visible in the version string, but we also need to make sure that the
|
|
|
|
|
version string is monotonically increasing so that @command{guix package
|
|
|
|
|
--upgrade} can determine which version is newer. Since commit
|
|
|
|
|
identifiers, notably with Git, are not monotonically increasing, we add
|
|
|
|
|
a revision number that we increase each time we upgrade to a newer
|
|
|
|
|
snapshot. The resulting version string looks like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
2.0.11-3.cabba9e
|
|
|
|
|
^ ^ ^
|
|
|
|
|
| | `-- upstream commit ID
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| `--- Guix package revision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
latest upstream version
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a good idea to strip commit identifiers in the @code{version}
|
|
|
|
|
field to, say, 7 digits. It avoids an aesthetic annoyance (assuming
|
|
|
|
|
aesthetics have a role to play here) as well as problems related to OS
|
|
|
|
|
limits such as the maximum shebang length (127 bytes for the Linux
|
2021-06-06 10:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
kernel). There are helper functions for doing this for packages using
|
|
|
|
|
@code{git-fetch} or @code{hg-fetch} (see below). It is best to use the
|
|
|
|
|
full commit identifiers in @code{origin}s, though, to avoid ambiguities.
|
|
|
|
|
A typical package definition may look like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(define my-package
|
|
|
|
|
(let ((commit "c3f29bc928d5900971f65965feaae59e1272a3f7")
|
|
|
|
|
(revision "1")) ;Guix package revision
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(version (git-version "0.9" revision commit))
|
|
|
|
|
(source (origin
|
|
|
|
|
(method git-fetch)
|
|
|
|
|
(uri (git-reference
|
|
|
|
|
(url "git://example.org/my-package.git")
|
|
|
|
|
(commit commit)))
|
|
|
|
|
(sha256 (base32 "1mbikn@dots{}"))
|
|
|
|
|
(file-name (git-file-name name version))))
|
|
|
|
|
;; @dots{}
|
|
|
|
|
)))
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-02 15:50:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@deffn {Procedure} git-version @var{VERSION} @var{REVISION} @var{COMMIT}
|
2021-06-06 10:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Return the version string for packages using @code{git-fetch}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(git-version "0.2.3" "0" "93818c936ee7e2f1ba1b315578bde363a7d43d05")
|
|
|
|
|
@result{} "0.2.3-0.93818c9"
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
@end deffn
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-02 15:50:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@deffn {Procedure} hg-version @var{VERSION} @var{REVISION} @var{CHANGESET}
|
2021-06-06 10:37:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Return the version string for packages using @code{hg-fetch}. It works
|
|
|
|
|
in the same way as @code{git-version}.
|
|
|
|
|
@end deffn
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Synopses and Descriptions
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Synopses and Descriptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package description
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex package synopsis
|
|
|
|
|
As we have seen before, each package in GNU@tie{}Guix includes a
|
|
|
|
|
synopsis and a description (@pxref{Defining Packages}). Synopses and
|
|
|
|
|
descriptions are important: They are what @command{guix package
|
|
|
|
|
--search} searches, and a crucial piece of information to help users
|
|
|
|
|
determine whether a given package suits their needs. Consequently,
|
|
|
|
|
packagers should pay attention to what goes into them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synopses must start with a capital letter and must not end with a
|
|
|
|
|
period. They must not start with ``a'' or ``the'', which usually does
|
|
|
|
|
not bring anything; for instance, prefer ``File-frobbing tool'' over ``A
|
|
|
|
|
tool that frobs files''. The synopsis should say what the package
|
|
|
|
|
is---e.g., ``Core GNU utilities (file, text, shell)''---or what it is
|
|
|
|
|
used for---e.g., the synopsis for GNU@tie{}grep is ``Print lines
|
|
|
|
|
matching a pattern''.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind that the synopsis must be meaningful for a very wide
|
|
|
|
|
audience. For example, ``Manipulate alignments in the SAM format''
|
|
|
|
|
might make sense for a seasoned bioinformatics researcher, but might be
|
|
|
|
|
fairly unhelpful or even misleading to a non-specialized audience. It
|
|
|
|
|
is a good idea to come up with a synopsis that gives an idea of the
|
|
|
|
|
application domain of the package. In this example, this might give
|
|
|
|
|
something like ``Manipulate nucleotide sequence alignments'', which
|
|
|
|
|
hopefully gives the user a better idea of whether this is what they are
|
|
|
|
|
looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions should take between five and ten lines. Use full
|
|
|
|
|
sentences, and avoid using acronyms without first introducing them.
|
|
|
|
|
Please avoid marketing phrases such as ``world-leading'',
|
|
|
|
|
``industrial-strength'', and ``next-generation'', and avoid superlatives
|
|
|
|
|
like ``the most advanced''---they are not helpful to users looking for a
|
|
|
|
|
package and may even sound suspicious. Instead, try to be factual,
|
|
|
|
|
mentioning use cases and features.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex Texinfo markup, in package descriptions
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptions can include Texinfo markup, which is useful to introduce
|
|
|
|
|
ornaments such as @code{@@code} or @code{@@dfn}, bullet lists, or
|
|
|
|
|
hyperlinks (@pxref{Overview,,, texinfo, GNU Texinfo}). However you
|
|
|
|
|
should be careful when using some characters for example @samp{@@} and
|
|
|
|
|
curly braces which are the basic special characters in Texinfo
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Special Characters,,, texinfo, GNU Texinfo}). User interfaces
|
2022-07-12 22:18:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
such as @command{guix show} take care of rendering it
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
appropriately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synopses and descriptions are translated by volunteers
|
2021-01-12 14:46:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/guix/packages, at
|
|
|
|
|
Weblate} so that as many users as possible can read them in
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
their native language. User interfaces search them and display them in
|
|
|
|
|
the language specified by the current locale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To allow @command{xgettext} to extract them as translatable strings,
|
|
|
|
|
synopses and descriptions @emph{must be literal strings}. This means
|
|
|
|
|
that you cannot use @code{string-append} or @code{format} to construct
|
|
|
|
|
these strings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
;; @dots{}
|
|
|
|
|
(synopsis "This is translatable")
|
|
|
|
|
(description (string-append "This is " "*not*" " translatable.")))
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation is a lot of work so, as a packager, please pay even more
|
|
|
|
|
attention to your synopses and descriptions as every change may entail
|
|
|
|
|
additional work for translators. In order to help them, it is possible
|
|
|
|
|
to make recommendations or instructions visible to them by inserting
|
|
|
|
|
special comments like this (@pxref{xgettext Invocation,,, gettext, GNU
|
|
|
|
|
Gettext}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-19 20:46:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
;; TRANSLATORS: "X11 resize-and-rotate" should not be translated.
|
|
|
|
|
(description "ARandR is designed to provide a simple visual front end
|
|
|
|
|
for the X11 resize-and-rotate (RandR) extension. @dots{}")
|
2020-10-19 20:46:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 18:08:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Snippets versus Phases
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Snippets versus Phases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex snippets, when to use
|
|
|
|
|
The boundary between using an origin snippet versus a build phase to
|
|
|
|
|
modify the sources of a package can be elusive. Origin snippets are
|
|
|
|
|
typically used to remove unwanted files such as bundled libraries,
|
|
|
|
|
nonfree sources, or to apply simple substitutions. The source derived
|
|
|
|
|
from an origin should produce a source that can be used to build the
|
|
|
|
|
package on any system that the upstream package supports (i.e., act as
|
|
|
|
|
the corresponding source). In particular, origin snippets must not
|
|
|
|
|
embed store items in the sources; such patching should rather be done
|
|
|
|
|
using build phases. Refer to the @code{origin} record documentation for
|
|
|
|
|
more information (@pxref{origin Reference}).
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-11 03:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Cyclic Module Dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Cyclic Module Dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While there cannot be circular dependencies between packages, Guile's
|
|
|
|
|
lax module loading mechanism allows circular dependencies between Guile
|
|
|
|
|
modules, which doesn't cause problems as long as the following
|
|
|
|
|
conditions are followed for two modules part of a dependency cycle:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex rules to cope with circular module dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Macros are not shared between the co-dependent modules
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Top-level variables are only referenced in delayed (@i{thunked}) package
|
|
|
|
|
fields: @code{arguments}, @code{native-inputs}, @code{inputs},
|
|
|
|
|
@code{propagated-inputs} or @code{replacement}
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Procedures referencing top-level variables from another module are not
|
|
|
|
|
called at the top level of a module themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straying away from the above rules may work while there are no
|
|
|
|
|
dependency cycles between modules, but given such cycles are confusing
|
|
|
|
|
and difficult to troubleshoot, it is best to follow the rules to avoid
|
|
|
|
|
introducing problems down the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a common trap to avoid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(define-public avr-binutils
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(inherit (cross-binutils "avr"))
|
|
|
|
|
(name "avr-binutils")))
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the above example, the @code{avr-binutils} package was defined in the
|
|
|
|
|
module @code{(gnu packages avr)}, and the @code{cross-binutils}
|
|
|
|
|
procedure in @code{(gnu packages cross-base)}. Because the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{inherit} field is not delayed (thunked), it is evaluated at the
|
|
|
|
|
top level at load time, which is problematic in the presence of module
|
|
|
|
|
dependency cycles. This could be resolved by turning the package into a
|
|
|
|
|
procedure instead, like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(define (make-avr-binutils)
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(inherit (cross-binutils "avr"))
|
|
|
|
|
(name "avr-binutils")))
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care would need to be taken to ensure the above procedure is only ever
|
|
|
|
|
used in a package delayed fields or within another procedure also not
|
|
|
|
|
called at the top level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 19:31:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Emacs Packages
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Emacs Packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex emacs, packaging
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex elisp, packaging
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs packages should preferably use the Emacs build system
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{emacs-build-system}), for uniformity and the benefits provided
|
|
|
|
|
by its build phases, such as the auto-generation of the autoloads file
|
2020-12-17 09:01:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and the byte compilation of the sources. Because there is no
|
2020-12-16 19:31:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
standardized way to run a test suite for Emacs packages, tests are
|
|
|
|
|
disabled by default. When a test suite is available, it should be
|
2020-12-17 09:01:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
enabled by setting the @code{#:tests?} argument to @code{#true}. By
|
2020-12-16 19:31:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
default, the command to run the test is @command{make check}, but any
|
|
|
|
|
command can be specified via the @code{#:test-command} argument. The
|
|
|
|
|
@code{#:test-command} argument expects a list containing a command and
|
2020-12-17 09:01:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
its arguments, to be invoked during the @code{check} phase.
|
2020-12-16 19:31:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Elisp dependencies of Emacs packages are typically provided as
|
|
|
|
|
@code{propagated-inputs} when required at run time. As for other
|
|
|
|
|
packages, build or test dependencies should be specified as
|
|
|
|
|
@code{native-inputs}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs packages sometimes depend on resources directories that should be
|
|
|
|
|
installed along the Elisp files. The @code{#:include} argument can be
|
|
|
|
|
used for that purpose, by specifying a list of regexps to match. The
|
|
|
|
|
best practice when using the @code{#:include} argument is to extend
|
|
|
|
|
rather than override its default value (accessible via the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{%default-include} variable). As an example, a yasnippet extension
|
|
|
|
|
package typically include a @file{snippets} directory, which could be
|
|
|
|
|
copied to the installation directory using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
2021-12-20 15:23:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
#:include (cons "^snippets/" %default-include)
|
2020-12-16 19:31:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When encountering problems, it is wise to check for the presence of the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{Package-Requires} extension header in the package main source
|
|
|
|
|
file, and whether any dependencies and their versions listed therein are
|
|
|
|
|
satisfied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Python Modules
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Python Modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex python
|
|
|
|
|
We currently package Python 2 and Python 3, under the Scheme variable names
|
|
|
|
|
@code{python-2} and @code{python} as explained in @ref{Version Numbers}.
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid confusion and naming clashes with other programming languages, it
|
|
|
|
|
seems desirable that the name of a package for a Python module contains
|
|
|
|
|
the word @code{python}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-11 19:31:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Some modules are compatible with only one version of Python, others with
|
|
|
|
|
both. If the package Foo is compiled with Python 3, we name it
|
|
|
|
|
@code{python-foo}. If it is compiled with Python 2, we name it
|
2023-03-24 02:15:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{python2-foo}. Python 2 packages are being removed from the
|
|
|
|
|
distribution; please do no not submit any new Python 2 packages.
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a project already contains the word @code{python}, we drop this;
|
|
|
|
|
for instance, the module python-dateutil is packaged under the names
|
|
|
|
|
@code{python-dateutil} and @code{python2-dateutil}. If the project name
|
|
|
|
|
starts with @code{py} (e.g.@: @code{pytz}), we keep it and prefix it as
|
|
|
|
|
described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-23 09:36:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@quotation Note
|
|
|
|
|
Currently there are two different build systems for Python packages in Guix:
|
|
|
|
|
@var{python-build-system} and @var{pyproject-build-system}. For the
|
|
|
|
|
longest time, Python packages were built from an informally specified
|
|
|
|
|
@file{setup.py} file. That worked amazingly well, considering Python's
|
|
|
|
|
success, but was difficult to build tooling around. As a result, a host
|
|
|
|
|
of alternative build systems emerged and the community eventually settled on a
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://peps.python.org/pep-0517/, formal standard} for specifying build
|
|
|
|
|
requirements. @var{pyproject-build-system} is Guix's implementation of this
|
|
|
|
|
standard. It is considered ``experimental'' in that it does not yet support
|
|
|
|
|
all the various PEP-517 @emph{build backends}, but you are encouraged to try
|
|
|
|
|
it for new Python packages and report any problems. It will eventually be
|
|
|
|
|
deprecated and merged into @var{python-build-system}.
|
|
|
|
|
@end quotation
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsubsection Specifying Dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex inputs, for Python packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dependency information for Python packages is usually available in the
|
|
|
|
|
package source tree, with varying degrees of accuracy: in the
|
2022-04-23 09:36:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@file{pyproject.toml} file, the @file{setup.py} file, in
|
|
|
|
|
@file{requirements.txt}, or in @file{tox.ini} (the latter mostly for
|
|
|
|
|
test dependencies).
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your mission, when writing a recipe for a Python package, is to map
|
|
|
|
|
these dependencies to the appropriate type of ``input'' (@pxref{package
|
|
|
|
|
Reference, inputs}). Although the @code{pypi} importer normally does a
|
|
|
|
|
good job (@pxref{Invoking guix import}), you may want to check the
|
|
|
|
|
following check list to determine which dependency goes where.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2022-04-23 09:36:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
We currently package Python with @code{setuptools} and @code{pip}
|
|
|
|
|
installed per default. This is about to change, and users are encouraged
|
|
|
|
|
to use @code{python-toolchain} if they want a build environment for Python.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix lint} will warn if @code{setuptools} or @code{pip} are
|
|
|
|
|
added as native-inputs because they are generally not necessary.
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Python dependencies required at run time go into
|
|
|
|
|
@code{propagated-inputs}. They are typically defined with the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{install_requires} keyword in @file{setup.py}, or in the
|
|
|
|
|
@file{requirements.txt} file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2022-04-23 09:36:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Python packages required only at build time---e.g., those listed under
|
|
|
|
|
@code{build-system.requires} in @file{pyproject.toml} or with the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{setup_requires} keyword in @file{setup.py}---or dependencies only
|
|
|
|
|
for testing---e.g., those in @code{tests_require} or @file{tox.ini}---go into
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{native-inputs}. The rationale is that (1) they do not need to be
|
|
|
|
|
propagated because they are not needed at run time, and (2) in a
|
|
|
|
|
cross-compilation context, it's the ``native'' input that we'd want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples are the @code{pytest}, @code{mock}, and @code{nose} test
|
|
|
|
|
frameworks. Of course if any of these packages is also required at
|
|
|
|
|
run-time, it needs to go to @code{propagated-inputs}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Anything that does not fall in the previous categories goes to
|
|
|
|
|
@code{inputs}, for example programs or C libraries required for building
|
|
|
|
|
Python packages containing C extensions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
If a Python package has optional dependencies (@code{extras_require}),
|
|
|
|
|
it is up to you to decide whether to add them or not, based on their
|
|
|
|
|
usefulness/overhead ratio (@pxref{Submitting Patches, @command{guix
|
|
|
|
|
size}}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Perl Modules
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Perl Modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex perl
|
|
|
|
|
Perl programs standing for themselves are named as any other package,
|
|
|
|
|
using the lowercase upstream name.
|
|
|
|
|
For Perl packages containing a single class, we use the lowercase class name,
|
|
|
|
|
replace all occurrences of @code{::} by dashes and prepend the prefix
|
|
|
|
|
@code{perl-}.
|
|
|
|
|
So the class @code{XML::Parser} becomes @code{perl-xml-parser}.
|
|
|
|
|
Modules containing several classes keep their lowercase upstream name and
|
|
|
|
|
are also prepended by @code{perl-}. Such modules tend to have the word
|
|
|
|
|
@code{perl} somewhere in their name, which gets dropped in favor of the
|
|
|
|
|
prefix. For instance, @code{libwww-perl} becomes @code{perl-libwww}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Java Packages
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Java Packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex java
|
|
|
|
|
Java programs standing for themselves are named as any other package,
|
|
|
|
|
using the lowercase upstream name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid confusion and naming clashes with other programming languages,
|
|
|
|
|
it is desirable that the name of a package for a Java package is
|
|
|
|
|
prefixed with @code{java-}. If a project already contains the word
|
|
|
|
|
@code{java}, we drop this; for instance, the package @code{ngsjava} is
|
|
|
|
|
packaged under the name @code{java-ngs}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Java packages containing a single class or a small class hierarchy,
|
|
|
|
|
we use the lowercase class name, replace all occurrences of @code{.} by
|
|
|
|
|
dashes and prepend the prefix @code{java-}. So the class
|
|
|
|
|
@code{apache.commons.cli} becomes package
|
|
|
|
|
@code{java-apache-commons-cli}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-17 09:21:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Rust Crates
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Rust Crates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex rust
|
|
|
|
|
Rust programs standing for themselves are named as any other package, using the
|
|
|
|
|
lowercase upstream name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To prevent namespace collisions we prefix all other Rust packages with the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{rust-} prefix. The name should be changed to lowercase as appropriate and
|
|
|
|
|
dashes should remain in place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the rust ecosystem it is common for multiple incompatible versions of a
|
2020-04-30 20:53:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
package to be used at any given time, so all package definitions should have a
|
|
|
|
|
versioned suffix. The versioned suffix is the left-most non-zero digit (and
|
|
|
|
|
any leading zeros, of course). This follows the ``caret'' version scheme
|
|
|
|
|
intended by Cargo. Examples@: @code{rust-clap-2}, @code{rust-rand-0.6}.
|
2020-02-17 09:21:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the difficulty in reusing rust packages as pre-compiled inputs for
|
|
|
|
|
other packages the Cargo build system (@pxref{Build Systems,
|
|
|
|
|
@code{cargo-build-system}}) presents the @code{#:cargo-inputs} and
|
|
|
|
|
@code{cargo-development-inputs} keywords as build system arguments. It would be
|
|
|
|
|
helpful to think of these as similar to @code{propagated-inputs} and
|
|
|
|
|
@code{native-inputs}. Rust @code{dependencies} and @code{build-dependencies}
|
|
|
|
|
should go in @code{#:cargo-inputs}, and @code{dev-dependencies} should go in
|
|
|
|
|
@code{#:cargo-development-inputs}. If a Rust package links to other libraries
|
|
|
|
|
then the standard placement in @code{inputs} and the like should be used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care should be taken to ensure the correct version of dependencies are used; to
|
|
|
|
|
this end we try to refrain from skipping the tests or using @code{#:skip-build?}
|
|
|
|
|
when possible. Of course this is not always possible, as the package may be
|
|
|
|
|
developed for a different Operating System, depend on features from the Nightly
|
|
|
|
|
Rust compiler, or the test suite may have atrophied since it was released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-18 18:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Elm Packages
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Elm Packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex Elm
|
|
|
|
|
Elm applications can be named like other software: their names need not
|
|
|
|
|
mention Elm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packages in the Elm sense (see @code{elm-build-system} under @ref{Build
|
|
|
|
|
Systems}) are required use names of the format
|
|
|
|
|
@var{author}@code{/}@var{project}, where both the @var{author} and the
|
|
|
|
|
@var{project} may contain hyphens internally, and the @var{author} sometimes
|
|
|
|
|
contains uppercase letters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To form the Guix package name from the upstream name, we follow a convention
|
|
|
|
|
similar to Python packages (@pxref{Python Modules}), adding an @code{elm-}
|
|
|
|
|
prefix unless the name would already begin with @code{elm-}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In many cases we can reconstruct an Elm package's upstream name heuristically,
|
|
|
|
|
but, since conversion to a Guix-style name involves a loss of information,
|
|
|
|
|
this is not always possible. Care should be taken to add the
|
2022-05-18 18:10:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{'upstream-name} property when necessary so that @samp{guix import elm}
|
|
|
|
|
will work correctly (@pxref{Invoking guix import}). The most notable scenarios
|
2022-05-18 18:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
when explicitly specifying the upstream name is necessary are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
When the @var{author} is @code{elm} and the @var{project} contains one or more
|
|
|
|
|
hyphens, as with @code{elm/virtual-dom}; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
When the @var{author} contains hyphens or uppercase letters, as with
|
|
|
|
|
@code{Elm-Canvas/raster-shapes}---unless the @var{author} is
|
|
|
|
|
@code{elm-explorations}, which is handled as a special case, so packages like
|
|
|
|
|
@code{elm-explorations/markdown} do @emph{not} need to use the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{'upstream-name} property.
|
|
|
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The module @code{(guix build-system elm)} provides the following utilities for
|
|
|
|
|
working with names and related conventions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-02 15:50:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@deffn {Procedure} elm-package-origin @var{elm-name} @var{version} @
|
2022-05-18 18:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@var{hash}
|
|
|
|
|
Returns a Git origin using the repository naming and tagging regime required
|
|
|
|
|
for a published Elm package with the upstream name @var{elm-name} at version
|
|
|
|
|
@var{version} with sha256 checksum @var{hash}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
|
|
|
|
(package
|
|
|
|
|
(name "elm-html")
|
|
|
|
|
(version "1.0.0")
|
|
|
|
|
(source
|
|
|
|
|
(elm-package-origin
|
|
|
|
|
"elm/html"
|
|
|
|
|
version
|
|
|
|
|
(base32 "15k1679ja57vvlpinpv06znmrxy09lbhzfkzdc89i01qa8c4gb4a")))
|
|
|
|
|
...)
|
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
|
|
|
|
@end deffn
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-02 15:50:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@deffn {Procedure} elm->package-name @var{elm-name}
|
2022-05-18 18:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Returns the Guix-style package name for an Elm package with upstream name
|
|
|
|
|
@var{elm-name}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that there is more than one possible @var{elm-name} for which
|
|
|
|
|
@code{elm->package-name} will produce a given result.
|
|
|
|
|
@end deffn
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-02 15:50:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@deffn {Procedure} guix-package->elm-name @var{package}
|
2022-05-18 18:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Given an Elm @var{package}, returns the possibly-inferred upstream name, or
|
|
|
|
|
@code{#f} the upstream name is not specified via the @code{'upstream-name}
|
|
|
|
|
property and can not be inferred by @code{infer-elm-package-name}.
|
|
|
|
|
@end deffn
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-06-02 15:50:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@deffn {Procedure} infer-elm-package-name @var{guix-name}
|
2022-05-18 18:10:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Given the @var{guix-name} of an Elm package, returns the inferred upstream
|
|
|
|
|
name, or @code{#f} if the upstream name can't be inferred. If the result is
|
|
|
|
|
not @code{#f}, supplying it to @code{elm->package-name} would produce
|
|
|
|
|
@var{guix-name}.
|
|
|
|
|
@end deffn
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-21 10:31:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Fonts
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Fonts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex fonts
|
|
|
|
|
For fonts that are in general not installed by a user for typesetting
|
|
|
|
|
purposes, or that are distributed as part of a larger software package,
|
|
|
|
|
we rely on the general packaging rules for software; for instance, this
|
|
|
|
|
applies to the fonts delivered as part of the X.Org system or fonts that
|
|
|
|
|
are part of TeX Live.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To make it easier for a user to search for fonts, names for other packages
|
|
|
|
|
containing only fonts are constructed as follows, independently of the
|
|
|
|
|
upstream package name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name of a package containing only one font family starts with
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-}; it is followed by the foundry name and a dash @code{-}
|
|
|
|
|
if the foundry is known, and the font family name, in which spaces are
|
|
|
|
|
replaced by dashes (and as usual, all upper case letters are transformed
|
|
|
|
|
to lower case).
|
|
|
|
|
For example, the Gentium font family by SIL is packaged under the name
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-sil-gentium}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a package containing several font families, the name of the collection
|
|
|
|
|
is used in the place of the font family name.
|
|
|
|
|
For instance, the Liberation fonts consist of three families,
|
|
|
|
|
Liberation Sans, Liberation Serif and Liberation Mono.
|
|
|
|
|
These could be packaged separately under the names
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-liberation-sans} and so on; but as they are distributed together
|
|
|
|
|
under a common name, we prefer to package them together as
|
|
|
|
|
@code{font-liberation}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the case where several formats of the same font family or font collection
|
|
|
|
|
are packaged separately, a short form of the format, prepended by a dash,
|
|
|
|
|
is added to the package name. We use @code{-ttf} for TrueType fonts,
|
|
|
|
|
@code{-otf} for OpenType fonts and @code{-type1} for PostScript Type 1
|
|
|
|
|
fonts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Coding Style
|
|
|
|
|
@section Coding Style
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general our code follows the GNU Coding Standards (@pxref{Top,,,
|
|
|
|
|
standards, GNU Coding Standards}). However, they do not say much about
|
|
|
|
|
Scheme, so here are some additional rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Programming Paradigm:: How to compose your elements.
|
|
|
|
|
* Modules:: Where to store your code?
|
|
|
|
|
* Data Types and Pattern Matching:: Implementing data structures.
|
|
|
|
|
* Formatting Code:: Writing conventions.
|
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Programming Paradigm
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Programming Paradigm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheme code in Guix is written in a purely functional style. One
|
|
|
|
|
exception is code that involves input/output, and procedures that
|
|
|
|
|
implement low-level concepts, such as the @code{memoize} procedure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Modules
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Modules
|
2023-10-17 07:13:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex build-side modules
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex host-side modules
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Guile modules that are meant to be used on the builder side must live in
|
|
|
|
|
the @code{(guix build @dots{})} name space. They must not refer to
|
|
|
|
|
other Guix or GNU modules. However, it is OK for a ``host-side'' module
|
2023-10-17 07:13:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
to use a build-side module. As an example, the @code{(guix
|
|
|
|
|
search-paths)} module should not be imported and used by a package since
|
|
|
|
|
it isn't meant to be used as a ``build-side'' module. It would also
|
|
|
|
|
couple the module with the package's dependency graph, which is
|
|
|
|
|
undesirable.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modules that deal with the broader GNU system should be in the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{(gnu @dots{})} name space rather than @code{(guix @dots{})}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Data Types and Pattern Matching
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Data Types and Pattern Matching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tendency in classical Lisp is to use lists to represent everything,
|
|
|
|
|
and then to browse them ``by hand'' using @code{car}, @code{cdr},
|
|
|
|
|
@code{cadr}, and co. There are several problems with that style,
|
|
|
|
|
notably the fact that it is hard to read, error-prone, and a hindrance
|
|
|
|
|
to proper type error reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-19 21:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@findex define-record-type*
|
|
|
|
|
@findex match-record
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex pattern matching
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Guix code should define appropriate data types (for instance, using
|
|
|
|
|
@code{define-record-type*}) rather than abuse lists. In addition, it
|
|
|
|
|
should use pattern matching, via Guile’s @code{(ice-9 match)} module,
|
2020-12-14 11:19:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
especially when matching lists (@pxref{Pattern Matching,,, guile, GNU
|
2022-11-19 21:40:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Guile Reference Manual}); pattern matching for records is better done
|
|
|
|
|
using @code{match-record} from @code{(guix records)}, which, unlike
|
|
|
|
|
@code{match}, verifies field names at macro-expansion time.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-05 14:15:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When defining a new record type, keep the @dfn{record type descriptor}
|
|
|
|
|
(RTD) private (@pxref{Records,,, guile, GNU Guile Reference Manual}, for
|
|
|
|
|
more on records and RTDs). As an example, the @code{(guix packages)}
|
|
|
|
|
module defines @code{<package>} as the RTD for package records but it
|
|
|
|
|
does not export it; instead, it exports a type predicate, a constructor,
|
|
|
|
|
and field accessors. Exporting RTDs would make it harder to change the
|
|
|
|
|
application binary interface (because code in other modules might be
|
|
|
|
|
matching fields by position) and would make it trivial for users to
|
|
|
|
|
forge records of that type, bypassing any checks we may have in the
|
|
|
|
|
official constructor (such as ``field sanitizers'').
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Formatting Code
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Formatting Code
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-12 13:56:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex formatting code
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex coding style
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When writing Scheme code, we follow common wisdom among Scheme
|
|
|
|
|
programmers. In general, we follow the
|
2020-03-10 12:34:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt, Riastradh's Lisp
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Style Rules}. This document happens to describe the conventions mostly
|
|
|
|
|
used in Guile’s code too. It is very thoughtful and well written, so
|
|
|
|
|
please do read it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some special forms introduced in Guix, such as the @code{substitute*}
|
|
|
|
|
macro, have special indentation rules. These are defined in the
|
2017-04-28 12:52:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@file{.dir-locals.el} file, which Emacs automatically uses. Also note
|
|
|
|
|
that Emacs-Guix provides @code{guix-devel-mode} mode that indents and
|
|
|
|
|
highlights Guix code properly (@pxref{Development,,, emacs-guix, The
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs-Guix Reference Manual}).
|
2017-01-12 13:56:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex indentation, of code
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex formatting, of code
|
|
|
|
|
If you do not use Emacs, please make sure to let your editor knows these
|
|
|
|
|
rules. To automatically indent a package definition, you can also run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2022-01-02 16:29:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guix style @var{package}
|
2017-01-12 13:56:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
2022-01-02 16:29:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@xref{Invoking guix style}, for more information.
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We require all top-level procedures to carry a docstring. This
|
|
|
|
|
requirement can be relaxed for simple private procedures in the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{(guix build @dots{})} name space, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedures should not have more than four positional parameters. Use
|
|
|
|
|
keyword parameters for procedures that take more than four parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Submitting Patches
|
|
|
|
|
@section Submitting Patches
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development is done using the Git distributed version control system.
|
|
|
|
|
Thus, access to the repository is not strictly necessary. We welcome
|
|
|
|
|
contributions in the form of patches as produced by @code{git
|
2021-09-20 23:37:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
format-patch} sent to the @email{guix-patches@@gnu.org} mailing list
|
2022-07-11 21:21:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Submitting patches to a project,,, git, Git User Manual}).
|
|
|
|
|
Contributors are encouraged to take a moment to set some Git repository
|
|
|
|
|
options (@pxref{Configuring Git}) first, which can improve the
|
|
|
|
|
readability of patches. Seasoned Guix developers may also want to look
|
|
|
|
|
at the section on commit access (@pxref{Commit Access}).
|
2017-02-13 08:56:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This mailing list is backed by a Debbugs instance, which allows us to
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
keep track of submissions (@pxref{Tracking Bugs and Changes}).
|
|
|
|
|
Each message sent to that mailing list gets a new tracking number
|
|
|
|
|
assigned; people can then follow up on the submission by sending email
|
|
|
|
|
to @code{@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org}, where @var{ISSUE_NUMBER}
|
|
|
|
|
is the tracking number (@pxref{Sending a Patch Series}).
|
2017-02-13 08:56:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Please write commit logs in the ChangeLog format (@pxref{Change Logs,,,
|
|
|
|
|
standards, GNU Coding Standards}); you can check the commit history for
|
|
|
|
|
examples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-03-05 19:54:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
You can help make the review process more efficient, and increase the
|
|
|
|
|
chance that your patch will be reviewed quickly, by describing the
|
|
|
|
|
context of your patch and the impact you expect it to have. For
|
|
|
|
|
example, if your patch is fixing something that is broken, describe the
|
|
|
|
|
problem and how your patch fixes it. Tell us how you have tested your
|
|
|
|
|
patch. Will users of the code changed by your patch have to adjust
|
|
|
|
|
their workflow at all? If so, tell us how. In general, try to imagine
|
|
|
|
|
what questions a reviewer will ask, and answer those questions in
|
|
|
|
|
advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Before submitting a patch that adds or modifies a package definition,
|
2015-06-17 22:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
please run through this check list:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
2017-11-08 16:19:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
If the authors of the packaged software provide a cryptographic
|
|
|
|
|
signature for the release tarball, make an effort to verify the
|
|
|
|
|
authenticity of the archive. For a detached GPG signature file this
|
|
|
|
|
would be done with the @code{gpg --verify} command.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-15 20:37:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Take some time to provide an adequate synopsis and description for the
|
|
|
|
|
package. @xref{Synopses and Descriptions}, for some guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-17 22:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Run @code{guix lint @var{package}}, where @var{package} is the
|
2015-06-10 11:39:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
name of the new or modified package, and fix any errors it reports
|
2015-06-17 22:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Invoking guix lint}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-02 16:29:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Run @code{guix style @var{package}} to format the new package definition
|
|
|
|
|
according to the project's conventions (@pxref{Invoking guix style}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-17 22:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure the package builds on your platform, using @code{guix build
|
|
|
|
|
@var{package}}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-03 15:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
We recommend you also try building the package on other supported
|
|
|
|
|
platforms. As you may not have access to actual hardware platforms, we
|
|
|
|
|
recommend using the @code{qemu-binfmt-service-type} to emulate them. In
|
2021-05-30 14:04:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
order to enable it, add the @code{virtualization} service module and the
|
|
|
|
|
following service to the list of services in your @code{operating-system}
|
|
|
|
|
configuration:
|
2019-02-03 15:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@lisp
|
2019-02-03 15:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(service qemu-binfmt-service-type
|
|
|
|
|
(qemu-binfmt-configuration
|
2021-05-30 14:04:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(platforms (lookup-qemu-platforms "arm" "aarch64"))))
|
2019-09-07 16:21:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end lisp
|
2019-02-03 15:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then reconfigure your system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can then build packages for different platforms by specifying the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{--system} option. For example, to build the "hello" package for
|
2021-05-25 07:04:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the armhf or aarch64 architectures, you would run the following
|
2019-03-24 17:36:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
commands, respectively:
|
2019-02-03 15:29:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix build --system=armhf-linux --rounds=2 hello
|
|
|
|
|
guix build --system=aarch64-linux --rounds=2 hello
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-28 13:41:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex bundling
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure the package does not use bundled copies of software already
|
|
|
|
|
available as separate packages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, packages include copies of the source code of their
|
|
|
|
|
dependencies as a convenience for users. However, as a distribution, we
|
|
|
|
|
want to make sure that such packages end up using the copy we already
|
|
|
|
|
have in the distribution, if there is one. This improves resource usage
|
|
|
|
|
(the dependency is built and stored only once), and allows the
|
|
|
|
|
distribution to make transverse changes such as applying security
|
|
|
|
|
updates for a given software package in a single place and have them
|
|
|
|
|
affect the whole system---something that bundled copies prevent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-17 22:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at the profile reported by @command{guix size}
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Invoking guix size}). This will allow you to notice references
|
|
|
|
|
to other packages unwillingly retained. It may also help determine
|
|
|
|
|
whether to split the package (@pxref{Packages with Multiple Outputs}),
|
2023-07-03 20:04:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
and which optional dependencies should be used. In particular, avoid
|
|
|
|
|
adding @code{texlive} as a dependency: because of its extreme size, use
|
|
|
|
|
@code{texlive-updmap.cfg} procedure instead.
|
2015-06-17 22:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Check that dependent packages (if applicable) are not affected by the
|
|
|
|
|
change; @code{guix refresh --list-dependent @var{package}} will help you
|
|
|
|
|
do that (@pxref{Invoking guix refresh}).
|
2018-05-26 13:39:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-19 22:55:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2015-12-08 22:27:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex determinism, of build processes
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex reproducible builds, checking
|
2015-10-19 22:55:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Check whether the package's build process is deterministic. This
|
|
|
|
|
typically means checking whether an independent build of the package
|
|
|
|
|
yields the exact same result that you obtained, bit for bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-08 22:27:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A simple way to do that is by building the same package several times in
|
|
|
|
|
a row on your machine (@pxref{Invoking guix build}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix build --rounds=2 my-package
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is enough to catch a class of common non-determinism issues, such
|
|
|
|
|
as timestamps or randomly-generated output in the build result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another option is to use @command{guix challenge} (@pxref{Invoking guix
|
|
|
|
|
challenge}). You may run it once the package has been committed and
|
2021-05-15 10:02:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
built by @code{@value{SUBSTITUTE-SERVER-1}} to check whether it obtains the same
|
2015-12-08 22:27:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
result as you did. Better yet: Find another machine that can build it
|
|
|
|
|
and run @command{guix publish}. Since the remote build machine is
|
|
|
|
|
likely different from yours, this can catch non-determinism issues
|
|
|
|
|
related to the hardware---e.g., use of different instruction set
|
|
|
|
|
extensions---or to the operating system kernel---e.g., reliance on
|
|
|
|
|
@code{uname} or @file{/proc} files.
|
2015-10-19 22:55:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-21 18:05:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
When writing documentation, please use gender-neutral wording when
|
|
|
|
|
referring to people, such as
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they, singular
|
|
|
|
|
``they''@comma{} ``their''@comma{} ``them''}, and so forth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-21 18:05:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Verify that your patch contains only one set of related changes.
|
|
|
|
|
Bundling unrelated changes together makes reviewing harder and slower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples of unrelated changes include the addition of several packages,
|
|
|
|
|
or a package update along with fixes to that package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-12 13:56:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2022-01-02 16:29:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Please follow our code formatting rules, possibly running
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix style} script to do that automatically for you
|
2017-01-12 13:56:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Formatting Code}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-10 16:06:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
When possible, use mirrors in the source URL (@pxref{Invoking guix download}).
|
|
|
|
|
Use reliable URLs, not generated ones. For instance, GitHub archives are not
|
|
|
|
|
necessarily identical from one generation to the next, so in this case it's
|
|
|
|
|
often better to clone the repository. Don't use the @command{name} field in
|
|
|
|
|
the URL: it is not very useful and if the name changes, the URL will probably
|
|
|
|
|
be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-02 09:13:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2019-12-13 12:31:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Check if Guix builds (@pxref{Building from Git}) and address the
|
|
|
|
|
warnings, especially those about use of undefined symbols.
|
2019-12-02 09:13:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-08 15:33:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure your changes do not break Guix and simulate a @code{guix pull} with:
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix pull --url=/path/to/your/checkout --profile=/tmp/guix.master
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-06-17 22:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-02-23 06:25:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When posting a patch to the mailing list, use @samp{[PATCH] @dots{}} as
|
2020-05-03 10:11:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
a subject, if your patch is to be applied on a branch other than
|
|
|
|
|
@code{master}, say @code{core-updates}, specify it in the subject like
|
2022-10-07 12:58:17 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@samp{[PATCH core-updates] @dots{}}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may use your email client or the @command{git send-email} command
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Sending a Patch Series}). We prefer to get patches in plain
|
|
|
|
|
text messages, either inline or as MIME attachments. You are advised to
|
|
|
|
|
pay attention if your email client changes anything like line breaks or
|
|
|
|
|
indentation which could potentially break the patches.
|
2017-09-18 09:12:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-09 16:05:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Expect some delay when you submit your very first patch to
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-patches@@gnu.org}. You have to wait until you get an
|
2021-05-23 08:35:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
acknowledgement with the assigned tracking number. Future acknowledgements
|
2021-05-09 16:05:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
should not be delayed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-18 15:25:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When a bug is resolved, please close the thread by sending an email to
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@email{@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}-done@@debbugs.gnu.org}.
|
2017-09-18 15:25:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-04 21:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
|
|
|
* Configuring Git::
|
|
|
|
|
* Sending a Patch Series::
|
|
|
|
|
* Teams::
|
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-20 23:37:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Configuring Git
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Configuring Git
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex git configuration
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{git format-patch}
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{git send-email}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have not done so already, you may wish to set a name and email
|
|
|
|
|
that will be associated with your commits (@pxref{telling git your name,
|
|
|
|
|
, Telling Git your name, git, Git User Manual}). If you wish to use a
|
2021-10-13 22:24:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
different name or email just for commits in this repository, you can
|
2021-09-20 23:37:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
use @command{git config --local}, or edit @file{.git/config} in the
|
|
|
|
|
repository instead of @file{~/.gitconfig}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-08 16:18:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex commit-msg hook
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Other important Git configuration will automatically be configured when
|
2023-10-08 16:18:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
building the project (@pxref{Building from Git}). A
|
|
|
|
|
@file{.git/hooks/commit-msg} hook will be installed that embeds
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{Change-Id} Git @emph{trailers} in your commit messages for
|
|
|
|
|
traceability purposes. It is important to preserve these when editing
|
|
|
|
|
your commit messages, particularly if a first version of your proposed
|
|
|
|
|
changes was already submitted for review. If you have a
|
|
|
|
|
@file{commit-msg} hook of your own you would like to use with Guix, you
|
|
|
|
|
can place it under the @file{.git/hooks/commit-msg.d/} directory.
|
2021-09-20 23:37:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 12:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Sending a Patch Series
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Sending a Patch Series
|
2017-09-18 09:12:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex patch series
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{git send-email}
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{git format-patch}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@unnumberedsubsubsec Single Patches
|
|
|
|
|
@anchor{Single Patches}
|
|
|
|
|
The @command{git send-email} command is the best way to send both single
|
|
|
|
|
patches and patch series (@pxref{Multiple Patches}) to the Guix mailing
|
|
|
|
|
list. Sending patches as email attachments may make them difficult to
|
|
|
|
|
review in some mail clients, and @command{git diff} does not store commit
|
|
|
|
|
metadata.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@quotation Note
|
|
|
|
|
The @command{git send-email} command is provided by the @code{send-email}
|
|
|
|
|
output of the @code{git} package, i.e. @code{git:send-email}.
|
|
|
|
|
@end quotation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following command will create a patch email from the latest commit,
|
|
|
|
|
open it in your @var{EDITOR} or @var{VISUAL} for editing, and send it to
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the Guix mailing list to be reviewed and merged. Assuming you have
|
|
|
|
|
already configured Git according to @xref{Configuring Git}, you can
|
|
|
|
|
simply use:
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ git send-email --annotate -1
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@quotation Tip
|
|
|
|
|
To add a prefix to the subject of your patch, you may use the
|
|
|
|
|
@option{--subject-prefix} option. The Guix project uses this to
|
|
|
|
|
specify that the patch is intended for a branch or repository
|
|
|
|
|
other than the @code{master} branch of
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
git send-email --annotate --subject-prefix='PATCH core-updates' -1
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
@end quotation
|
2017-09-18 09:12:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The patch email contains a three-dash separator line after the commit
|
|
|
|
|
message. You may ``annotate'' the patch with explanatory text by adding
|
|
|
|
|
it under this line. If you do not wish to annotate the email, you may
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
drop the @option{--annotate} option.
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to send a revised patch, don't resend it like this or send
|
|
|
|
|
a ``fix'' patch to be applied on top of the last one; instead, use
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@command{git commit --amend} or @url{https://git-rebase.io,
|
|
|
|
|
@command{git rebase}} to modify the commit, and use the
|
|
|
|
|
@email{@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org} address and the @option{-v}
|
|
|
|
|
flag with @command{git send-email}.
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ git commit --amend
|
|
|
|
|
$ git send-email --annotate -v@var{REVISION} \
|
|
|
|
|
--to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org -1
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-26 11:54:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@quotation Note
|
|
|
|
|
Due to an apparent bug in @command{git send-email},
|
|
|
|
|
@option{-v @var{REVISION}} (with the space) will not work; you
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{must} use @option{-v@var{REVISION}}.
|
|
|
|
|
@end quotation
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
You can find out @var{ISSUE_NUMBER} either by searching on the mumi
|
2023-03-06 20:39:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
interface at @url{https://issues.guix.gnu.org} for the name of your patch or
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
reading the acknowledgement email sent automatically by Debbugs in
|
|
|
|
|
reply to incoming bugs and patches, which contains the bug number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@unnumberedsubsubsec Notifying Teams
|
|
|
|
|
@anchor{Notifying Teams}
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex teams
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If your git checkout has been correctly configured (@pxref{Configuring
|
|
|
|
|
Git}), the @command{git send-email} command will automatically notify
|
|
|
|
|
the appropriate team members, based on the scope of your changes. This
|
|
|
|
|
relies on the @file{etc/teams.scm} script, which can also be invoked
|
|
|
|
|
manually if you do not use the preferred @command{git send-email}
|
|
|
|
|
command to submit patches. To list the available actions of the script,
|
|
|
|
|
you can invoke it via the @command{etc/teams.scm help} command. For
|
2023-11-01 16:18:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
more information regarding teams, @pxref{Teams}.
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@unnumberedsubsubsec Multiple Patches
|
|
|
|
|
@anchor{Multiple Patches}
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex cover letter
|
|
|
|
|
While @command{git send-email} alone will suffice for a single
|
|
|
|
|
patch, an unfortunate flaw in Debbugs means you need to be more
|
|
|
|
|
careful when sending multiple patches: if you send them all to the
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-patches@@gnu.org} address, a new issue will be created
|
|
|
|
|
for each patch!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When sending a series of patches, it's best to send a Git ``cover
|
|
|
|
|
letter'' first, to give reviewers an overview of the patch series.
|
|
|
|
|
We can create a directory called @file{outgoing} containing both
|
|
|
|
|
our patch series and a cover letter called @file{0000-cover-letter.patch}
|
|
|
|
|
with @command{git format-patch}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ git format-patch -@var{NUMBER_COMMITS} -o outgoing \
|
|
|
|
|
--cover-letter --base=auto
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can now send @emph{just} the cover letter to the
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-patches@@gnu.org} address, which will create an issue
|
|
|
|
|
that we can send the rest of the patches to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ git send-email outgoing/0000-cover-letter.patch --annotate
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ rm outgoing/0000-cover-letter.patch # we don't want to resend it!
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ensure you edit the email to add an appropriate subject line and
|
|
|
|
|
blurb before sending it. Note the automatically generated shortlog
|
|
|
|
|
and diffstat below the blurb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the Debbugs mailer has replied to your cover letter email, you
|
|
|
|
|
can send the actual patches to the newly-created issue address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ git send-email outgoing/*.patch --to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ rm -rf outgoing # we don't need these anymore
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thankfully, this @command{git format-patch} dance is not necessary
|
|
|
|
|
to send an amended patch series, since an issue already exists for
|
|
|
|
|
the patchset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ git send-email -@var{NUMBER_COMMITS} -v@var{REVISION} \
|
2023-05-18 17:50:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
--to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org
|
2022-10-25 18:42:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If need be, you may use @option{--cover-letter --annotate} to send
|
|
|
|
|
another cover letter, e.g. for explaining what's changed since the last
|
|
|
|
|
revision, and these changes are necessary.
|
2022-09-07 15:05:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-01 12:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Teams
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Teams
|
2022-09-07 15:05:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex teams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several teams mentoring different parts of the Guix source
|
|
|
|
|
code. To list all those teams, you can run from a Guix checkout:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ ./etc/teams.scm list-teams
|
|
|
|
|
id: mentors
|
|
|
|
|
name: Mentors
|
|
|
|
|
description: A group of mentors who chaperone contributions by newcomers.
|
|
|
|
|
members:
|
|
|
|
|
+ Christopher Baines <mail@@cbaines.net>
|
|
|
|
|
+ Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@@elephly.net>
|
|
|
|
|
+ Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@@gnu.org>
|
|
|
|
|
+ jgart <jgart@@dismail.de>
|
|
|
|
|
+ Ludovic Courtès <ludo@@gnu.org>
|
|
|
|
|
@dots{}
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can run the following command to have the @code{Mentors} team put in
|
|
|
|
|
CC of a patch series:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
2023-05-18 17:50:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
$ git send-email --to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org \
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
--header-cmd='etc/teams.scm cc-mentors-header-cmd' *.patch
|
2022-09-07 15:05:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The appropriate team or teams can also be inferred from the modified
|
|
|
|
|
files. For instance, if you want to send the two latest commits of the
|
|
|
|
|
current Git repository to review, you can run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ guix shell -D guix
|
2023-05-18 17:50:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[env]$ git send-email --to=@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}@@debbugs.gnu.org -2
|
2022-09-07 15:05:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Tracking Bugs and Changes
|
|
|
|
|
@section Tracking Bugs and Changes
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This section describes how the Guix project tracks its bug reports,
|
|
|
|
|
patch submissions and topic branches.
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
2023-09-04 21:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* The Issue Tracker:: The official bug and patch tracker.
|
|
|
|
|
* Managing Patches and Branches:: How changes to Guix are managed.
|
|
|
|
|
* Debbugs User Interfaces:: Ways to interact with Debbugs.
|
|
|
|
|
* Debbugs Usertags:: Tag reports with custom labels.
|
2023-10-22 01:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
* Cuirass Build Notifications:: Be alerted of any breakage via RSS feeds.
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node The Issue Tracker
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection The Issue Tracker
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex bug reports, tracking
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex patch submissions, tracking
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex issue tracking
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex Debbugs, issue tracking system
|
|
|
|
|
Bug reports and patch submissions are currently tracked using the
|
|
|
|
|
Debbugs instance at @uref{https://bugs.gnu.org}. Bug reports are filed
|
|
|
|
|
against the @code{guix} ``package'' (in Debbugs parlance), by sending
|
|
|
|
|
email to @email{bug-guix@@gnu.org}, while patch submissions are filed
|
|
|
|
|
against the @code{guix-patches} package by sending email to
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-patches@@gnu.org} (@pxref{Submitting Patches}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Managing Patches and Branches
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Managing Patches and Branches
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex branching strategy
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex rebuild scheduling strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes should be posted to @email{guix-patches@@gnu.org}. This mailing
|
|
|
|
|
list fills the patch-tracking database (@pxref{The Issue Tracker}). It
|
|
|
|
|
also allows patches to be picked up and tested by the quality assurance
|
|
|
|
|
tooling; the result of that testing eventually shows up on the dashboard
|
|
|
|
|
at @indicateurl{https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/@var{ISSUE_NUMBER}}, where
|
|
|
|
|
@var{ISSUE_NUMBER} is the number assigned by the issue tracker. Leave
|
|
|
|
|
time for a review, without committing anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an exception, some changes considered ``trivial'' or ``obvious'' may
|
|
|
|
|
be pushed directly to the @code{master} branch. This includes changes
|
|
|
|
|
to fix typos and reverting commits that caused immediate problems. This
|
|
|
|
|
is subject to being adjusted, allowing individuals to commit directly on
|
|
|
|
|
non-controversial changes on parts they’re familiar with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes which affect more than 300 dependent packages (@pxref{Invoking
|
|
|
|
|
guix refresh}) should first be pushed to a topic branch other than
|
|
|
|
|
@code{master}; the set of changes should be consistent---e.g., ``GNOME
|
|
|
|
|
update'', ``NumPy update'', etc. This allows for testing: the branch
|
|
|
|
|
will automatically show up at
|
|
|
|
|
@indicateurl{https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/@var{branch}}, with an
|
|
|
|
|
indication of its build status on various platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-16 15:44:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex feature branches, coordination
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
To help coordinate the merging of branches, you must create a new
|
|
|
|
|
guix-patches issue each time you wish to merge a branch (@pxref{The
|
2023-08-16 15:44:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Issue Tracker}). The title of the issue requesting to merge a branch
|
|
|
|
|
should have the following format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex merge requests, template
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
Request for merging "@var{name}" branch
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The @url{https://qa.guix.gnu.org/, QA infrastructure} recognizes such
|
|
|
|
|
issues and lists the merge requests on its main page. Normally branches
|
|
|
|
|
will be merged in a ``first come, first merged'' manner, tracked through
|
|
|
|
|
the guix-patches issues.
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you agree on a different order with those involved, you can track
|
|
|
|
|
this by updating which issues block@footnote{You can mark an issue as
|
|
|
|
|
blocked by another by emailing @email{control@@debbugs.gnu.org} with the
|
|
|
|
|
following line in the body of the email: @code{block XXXXX by YYYYY}.
|
|
|
|
|
Where @code{XXXXX} is the number for the blocked issue, and @code{YYYYY}
|
|
|
|
|
is the number for the issue blocking it.} which other issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, to know which branch is at the front of the queue, look for
|
|
|
|
|
the oldest issue, or the issue that isn't @dfn{blocked} by any other
|
|
|
|
|
branch merges. An ordered list of branches with the open issues is
|
|
|
|
|
available at @url{https://qa.guix.gnu.org}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a branch is at the front of the queue, wait until sufficient time
|
|
|
|
|
has passed for the build farms to have processed the changes, and for
|
|
|
|
|
the necessary testing to have happened. For example, you can check
|
|
|
|
|
@indicateurl{https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/@var{branch}} to see
|
|
|
|
|
information on some builds and substitute availability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Debbugs User Interfaces
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Debbugs User Interfaces
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-04 21:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsubsection Web interface
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
A web interface (actually @emph{two} web interfaces!) are available to
|
|
|
|
|
browse issues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2020-06-19 23:09:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://issues.guix.gnu.org} provides a pleasant
|
|
|
|
|
interface@footnote{The web interface at
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://issues.guix.gnu.org} is powered by Mumi, a nice piece of
|
|
|
|
|
software written in Guile, and you can help! See
|
2023-11-07 11:01:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/mumi.git}.} to browse
|
2020-06-19 23:09:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
bug reports and patches, and to participate in discussions;
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@url{https://bugs.gnu.org/guix} lists bug reports;
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://bugs.gnu.org/guix-patches} lists patch submissions.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-19 23:09:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
To view discussions related to issue number @var{n}, go to
|
|
|
|
|
@indicateurl{https://issues.guix.gnu.org/@var{n}} or
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@indicateurl{https://bugs.gnu.org/@var{n}}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-09-04 21:31:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsubsection Command-line interface
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mumi also comes with a command-line interface that can be used to search
|
|
|
|
|
existing issues, open new issues and send patches. You do not need to
|
|
|
|
|
use Emacs to use the mumi command-line client. You interact with it
|
|
|
|
|
only on the command-line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To use the mumi command-line interface, navigate to a local clone of the
|
|
|
|
|
Guix git repository, and drop into a shell with mumi, git and
|
|
|
|
|
git:send-email installed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
$ cd guix
|
|
|
|
|
~/guix$ guix shell mumi git git:send-email
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To search for issues, say all open issues about "zig", run
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
~/guix [env]$ mumi search zig is:open
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60889 Add zig-build-system
|
|
|
|
|
opened on 17 Jan 17:37 Z by Ekaitz Zarraga
|
|
|
|
|
#61036 [PATCH 0/3] Update zig to 0.10.1
|
|
|
|
|
opened on 24 Jan 09:42 Z by Efraim Flashner
|
|
|
|
|
#39136 [PATCH] gnu: services: Add endlessh.
|
|
|
|
|
opened on 14 Jan 2020 21:21 by Nicol? Balzarotti
|
|
|
|
|
#60424 [PATCH] gnu: Add python-online-judge-tools
|
|
|
|
|
opened on 30 Dec 2022 07:03 by gemmaro
|
|
|
|
|
#45601 [PATCH 0/6] vlang 0.2 update
|
|
|
|
|
opened on 1 Jan 2021 19:23 by Ryan Prior
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pick an issue and make it the "current" issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
~/guix [env]$ mumi current 61036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61036 [PATCH 0/3] Update zig to 0.10.1
|
|
|
|
|
opened on 24 Jan 09:42 Z by Efraim Flashner
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once an issue is the current issue, you can easily create and send
|
|
|
|
|
patches to it using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
~/guix [env]$ git format-patch origin/master
|
|
|
|
|
~/guix [env]$ mumi send-email foo.patch bar.patch
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that you do not have to pass in @samp{--to} or @samp{--cc}
|
|
|
|
|
arguments to @command{git format-patch}. @command{mumi send-email} will
|
|
|
|
|
put them in correctly when sending the patches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To open a new issue, run
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
~/guix [env]$ mumi new
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and send patches
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
~/guix [env]$ mumi send-email foo.patch bar.patch
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@command{mumi send-email} is really a wrapper around @command{git
|
|
|
|
|
send-email} that automates away all the nitty-gritty of sending patches.
|
|
|
|
|
It uses the current issue state to automatically figure out the correct
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{To} address to send to, other participants to @samp{Cc}, headers
|
|
|
|
|
to add, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also note that, unlike @command{git send-email}, @command{mumi
|
|
|
|
|
send-email} works perfectly well with single and multiple patches alike.
|
|
|
|
|
It automates away the debbugs dance of sending the first patch, waiting
|
|
|
|
|
for a response from debbugs and sending the remaining patches. It does
|
|
|
|
|
so by sending the first patch, polling the server for a response, and
|
|
|
|
|
then sending the remaining patches. This polling can unfortunately take
|
|
|
|
|
a few minutes. So, please be patient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsubsection Emacs interface
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you use Emacs, you may find it more convenient to interact with
|
|
|
|
|
issues using @file{debbugs.el}, which you can install with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
guix install emacs-debbugs
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, to list all open issues on @code{guix-patches}, hit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
@kbd{C-u} @kbd{M-x} debbugs-gnu @kbd{RET} @kbd{RET} guix-patches @kbd{RET} n y
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-19 00:30:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
For a more convenient (shorter) way to access both the bugs and patches
|
|
|
|
|
submissions, you may want to configure the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{debbugs-gnu-default-packages} and
|
|
|
|
|
@code{debbugs-gnu-default-severities} Emacs variables (@pxref{Viewing
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs within Emacs}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To search for bugs, @samp{@kbd{M-x} debbugs-gnu-guix-search} can be
|
|
|
|
|
used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:05:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@xref{Top,,, debbugs-ug, Debbugs User Guide}, for more information on
|
|
|
|
|
this nifty tool!
|
2020-01-01 15:14:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Debbugs Usertags
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Debbugs Usertags
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex usertags, for debbugs
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex Debbugs usertags
|
|
|
|
|
Debbugs provides a feature called @dfn{usertags} that allows any user to
|
|
|
|
|
tag any bug with an arbitrary label. Bugs can be searched by usertag,
|
|
|
|
|
so this is a handy way to organize bugs@footnote{The list of usertags is
|
|
|
|
|
public information, and anyone can modify any user's list of usertags,
|
2023-10-10 12:49:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
so keep that in mind if you choose to use this feature.}. If you use
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs Debbugs, the entry-point to consult existing usertags is the
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{C-u M-x debbugs-gnu-usertags} procedure. To set a usertag, press
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{C} while consulting a bug within the *Guix-Patches* buffer opened
|
|
|
|
|
with @samp{C-u M-x debbugs-gnu-bugs} buffer, then select @code{usertag}
|
|
|
|
|
and follow the instructions.
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, to view all the bug reports (or patches, in the case of
|
|
|
|
|
@code{guix-patches}) tagged with the usertag @code{powerpc64le-linux}
|
2021-07-06 04:08:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
for the user @code{guix}, open a URL like the following in a web
|
|
|
|
|
browser:
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=powerpc64le-linux;users=guix}.
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information on how to use usertags, please refer to the
|
|
|
|
|
documentation for Debbugs or the documentation for whatever tool you use
|
|
|
|
|
to interact with Debbugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Guix, we are experimenting with usertags to keep track of
|
2023-10-10 12:49:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
architecture-specific issues, as well as reviewed ones. To facilitate
|
|
|
|
|
collaboration, all our usertags are associated with the single user
|
|
|
|
|
@code{guix}. The following usertags currently exist for that user:
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item powerpc64le-linux
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this usertag is to make it easy to find the issues that
|
|
|
|
|
matter most for the @code{powerpc64le-linux} system type. Please assign
|
|
|
|
|
this usertag to bugs or patches that affect @code{powerpc64le-linux} but
|
|
|
|
|
not other system types. In addition, you may use it to identify issues
|
|
|
|
|
that for some reason are particularly important for the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{powerpc64le-linux} system type, even if the issue affects other
|
|
|
|
|
system types, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item reproducibility
|
|
|
|
|
For issues related to reproducibility. For example, it would be
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate to assign this usertag to a bug report for a package that
|
|
|
|
|
fails to build reproducibly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-10 12:49:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item reviewed-looks-good
|
|
|
|
|
You have reviewed the series and it looks good to you (LGTM).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're a committer and you want to add a usertag, just start using it
|
2021-07-06 04:08:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
with the @code{guix} user. If the usertag proves useful to you,
|
|
|
|
|
consider updating this section of the manual so that others will know
|
|
|
|
|
what your usertag means.
|
2021-06-23 02:44:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-22 01:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Cuirass Build Notifications
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Cuirass Build Notifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex build event notifications, RSS feed
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex notifications, build events
|
|
|
|
|
Cuirass includes @acronym{RSS, Really Simple Syndication} feeds as one
|
|
|
|
|
of its features (@pxref{Notifications,,,cuirass}). Since
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://ci.guix.gnu.org/, Berlin} runs an instance of Cuirass, this
|
|
|
|
|
feature can be used to keep track of recently broken or fixed packages
|
|
|
|
|
caused by changes pushed to the Guix git repository. Any RSS client can
|
|
|
|
|
be used. A good one, included with Emacs, is @xref{Gnus,,,gnus}. To
|
|
|
|
|
register the feed, copy its URL, then from the main Gnus buffer,
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{*Group*}, do the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex Gnus, configuration to read CI RSS feeds
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex RSS feeds, Gnus configuration
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
@kbd{G R} https://ci.guix.gnu.org/events/rss/?specification=master RET
|
|
|
|
|
Guix CI - master RET Build events for specification master. RET
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
Then, back at the @samp{*Group*} buffer, press @kbd{s} to save the newly
|
|
|
|
|
added RSS group. As for any other Gnus group, you can update its
|
|
|
|
|
content by pressing the @kbd{g} key. You should now receive
|
|
|
|
|
notifications that read like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
. [ ?: Cuirass ] Build tree-sitter-meson.aarch64-linux on master is fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
. [ ?: Cuirass ] Build rust-pbkdf2.aarch64-linux on master is fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
. [ ?: Cuirass ] Build rust-pbkdf2.x86_64-linux on master is fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
|
|
|
where each RSS entry contains a link to the Cuirass build details page
|
|
|
|
|
of the associated build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:14:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Commit Access
|
|
|
|
|
@section Commit Access
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex commit access, for developers
|
2021-05-24 09:57:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Everyone can contribute to Guix without having commit access
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Submitting Patches}). However, for frequent contributors,
|
2022-01-06 16:10:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
having write access to the repository can be convenient. As a rule of
|
|
|
|
|
thumb, a contributor should have accumulated fifty (50) reviewed commits
|
|
|
|
|
to be considered as a committer and have sustained their activity in the
|
|
|
|
|
project for at least 6 months. This ensures enough interactions with
|
|
|
|
|
the contributor, which is essential for mentoring and assessing whether
|
|
|
|
|
they are ready to become a committer. Commit access should not be
|
|
|
|
|
thought of as a ``badge of honor'' but rather as a responsibility a
|
2023-03-17 20:07:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
contributor is willing to take to help the project. It is expected from
|
|
|
|
|
all contributors, and even more so from committers, to help build
|
|
|
|
|
consensus and make decisions based on consensus. To learn what
|
|
|
|
|
consensus decision making means and understand its finer details, you
|
|
|
|
|
are encouraged to read
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus}.
|
2021-05-24 09:57:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following sections explain how to get commit access, how to be ready
|
|
|
|
|
to push commits, and the policies and community expectations for commits
|
|
|
|
|
pushed upstream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsection Applying for Commit Access
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you deem it necessary, consider applying for commit
|
2020-01-01 15:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
access by following these steps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Find three committers who would vouch for you. You can view the list of
|
|
|
|
|
committers at
|
|
|
|
|
@url{https://savannah.gnu.org/project/memberlist.php?group=guix}. Each
|
|
|
|
|
of them should email a statement to @email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org} (a
|
|
|
|
|
private alias for the collective of maintainers), signed with their
|
|
|
|
|
OpenPGP key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committers are expected to have had some interactions with you as a
|
|
|
|
|
contributor and to be able to judge whether you are sufficiently
|
|
|
|
|
familiar with the project's practices. It is @emph{not} a judgment on
|
|
|
|
|
the value of your work, so a refusal should rather be interpreted as
|
|
|
|
|
``let's try again later''.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Send @email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org} a message stating your intent,
|
|
|
|
|
listing the three committers who support your application, signed with
|
|
|
|
|
the OpenPGP key you will use to sign commits, and giving its fingerprint
|
|
|
|
|
(see below). See @uref{https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en/}, for an
|
|
|
|
|
introduction to public-key cryptography with GnuPG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-02 21:53:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@c See <https://sha-mbles.github.io/>.
|
|
|
|
|
Set up GnuPG such that it never uses the SHA1 hash algorithm for digital
|
|
|
|
|
signatures, which is known to be unsafe since 2019, for instance by
|
|
|
|
|
adding the following line to @file{~/.gnupg/gpg.conf} (@pxref{GPG
|
|
|
|
|
Esoteric Options,,, gnupg, The GNU Privacy Guard Manual}):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
digest-algo sha512
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Maintainers ultimately decide whether to grant you commit access,
|
|
|
|
|
usually following your referrals' recommendation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
2020-05-02 21:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex OpenPGP, signed commits
|
2020-01-01 15:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If and once you've been given access, please send a message to
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org} to say so, again signed with the OpenPGP key
|
|
|
|
|
you will use to sign commits (do that before pushing your first commit).
|
|
|
|
|
That way, everyone can notice and ensure you control that OpenPGP key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-02 21:46:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@quotation Important
|
|
|
|
|
Before you can push for the first time, maintainers must:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
add your OpenPGP key to the @code{keyring} branch;
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
add your OpenPGP fingerprint to the @file{.guix-authorizations} file of
|
|
|
|
|
the branch(es) you will commit to.
|
|
|
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
@end quotation
|
2020-01-01 15:32:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure to read the rest of this section and... profit!
|
|
|
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@quotation Note
|
|
|
|
|
Maintainers are happy to give commit access to people who have been
|
|
|
|
|
contributing for some time and have a track record---don't be shy and
|
|
|
|
|
don't underestimate your work!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, note that the project is working towards a more automated patch
|
|
|
|
|
review and merging system, which, as a consequence, may lead us to have
|
|
|
|
|
fewer people with commit access to the main repository. Stay tuned!
|
|
|
|
|
@end quotation
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:14:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
All commits that are pushed to the central repository on Savannah must
|
|
|
|
|
be signed with an OpenPGP key, and the public key should be uploaded to
|
|
|
|
|
your user account on Savannah and to public key servers, such as
|
|
|
|
|
@code{keys.openpgp.org}. To configure Git to automatically sign
|
|
|
|
|
commits, run:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
git config commit.gpgsign true
|
2021-06-13 10:09:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Substitute the fingerprint of your public PGP key.
|
2020-01-01 15:14:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
git config user.signingkey CABBA6EA1DC0FF33
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-05 06:46:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
To check that commits are signed with correct key, use:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
make authenticate
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-04-23 15:43:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
To avoid accidentally pushing unsigned or signed with the wrong key
|
|
|
|
|
commits to Savannah, make sure to configure Git according to
|
|
|
|
|
@xref{Configuring Git}.
|
2022-09-05 06:46:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-24 09:57:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsection Commit Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-23 10:37:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you get commit access, please make sure to follow the policy below
|
|
|
|
|
(discussions of the policy can take place on
|
2021-05-24 09:57:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Ensure you're aware of how the changes should be handled
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Managing Patches and Branches}) prior to being pushed to the
|
|
|
|
|
repository, especially for the @code{master} branch.
|
2022-11-23 10:37:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-31 08:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If you're committing and pushing your own changes, try and wait at least
|
|
|
|
|
one week (two weeks for more significant changes) after you send them
|
|
|
|
|
for review. After this, if no one else is available to review them and
|
|
|
|
|
if you're confident about the changes, it's OK to commit.
|
2021-05-24 09:57:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 15:14:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When pushing a commit on behalf of somebody else, please add a
|
|
|
|
|
@code{Signed-off-by} line at the end of the commit log message---e.g.,
|
|
|
|
|
with @command{git am --signoff}. This improves tracking of who did
|
|
|
|
|
what.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-21 21:25:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When adding channel news entries (@pxref{Channels, Writing Channel
|
|
|
|
|
News}), make sure they are well-formed by running the following command
|
|
|
|
|
right before pushing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
make check-channel-news
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-24 20:16:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsection Addressing Issues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer review (@pxref{Submitting Patches}) and tools such as
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix lint} (@pxref{Invoking guix lint}) and the test suite
|
|
|
|
|
(@pxref{Running the Test Suite}) should catch issues before they are
|
|
|
|
|
pushed. Yet, commits that ``break'' functionality might occasionally
|
|
|
|
|
go through. When that happens, there are two priorities: mitigating
|
|
|
|
|
the impact, and understanding what happened to reduce the chance of
|
|
|
|
|
similar incidents in the future. The responsibility for both these
|
|
|
|
|
things primarily lies with those involved, but like everything this is
|
|
|
|
|
a group effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some issues can directly affect all users---for instance because they
|
|
|
|
|
make @command{guix pull} fail or break core functionality, because they
|
|
|
|
|
break major packages (at build time or run time), or because they
|
|
|
|
|
introduce known security vulnerabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex reverting commits
|
|
|
|
|
The people involved in authoring, reviewing, and pushing such
|
|
|
|
|
commit(s) should be at the forefront to mitigate their impact in a
|
|
|
|
|
timely fashion: by pushing a followup commit to fix it (if possible),
|
|
|
|
|
or by reverting it to leave time to come up with a proper fix, and by
|
|
|
|
|
communicating with other developers about the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If these persons are unavailable to address the issue in time, other
|
|
|
|
|
committers are entitled to revert the commit(s), explaining in the
|
|
|
|
|
commit log and on the mailing list what the problem was, with the goal
|
|
|
|
|
of leaving time to the original committer, reviewer(s), and author(s)
|
|
|
|
|
to propose a way forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the problem has been dealt with, it is the responsibility of
|
|
|
|
|
those involved to make sure the situation is understood. If you are
|
|
|
|
|
working to understand what happened, focus on gathering information
|
|
|
|
|
and avoid assigning any blame. Do ask those involved to describe what
|
|
|
|
|
happened, do not ask them to explain the situation---this would
|
|
|
|
|
implicitly blame them, which is unhelpful. Accountability comes from
|
|
|
|
|
a consensus about the problem, learning from it and improving
|
|
|
|
|
processes so that it's less likely to reoccur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-24 09:57:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsection Commit Revocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-12 20:26:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
In order to reduce the possibility of mistakes, committers will have
|
|
|
|
|
their Savannah account removed from the Guix Savannah project and their
|
|
|
|
|
key removed from @file{.guix-authorizations} after 12 months of
|
|
|
|
|
inactivity; they can ask to regain commit access by emailing the
|
|
|
|
|
maintainers, without going through the vouching process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-24 20:38:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Maintainers@footnote{See @uref{https://guix.gnu.org/en/about} for the
|
|
|
|
|
current list of maintainers. You can email them privately at
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}.} may also revoke an individual's
|
|
|
|
|
commit rights, as a last resort, if cooperation with the rest of the
|
|
|
|
|
community has caused too much friction---even within the bounds of the
|
|
|
|
|
project's code of conduct (@pxref{Contributing}). They would only do so
|
|
|
|
|
after public or private discussion with the individual and a clear
|
|
|
|
|
notice. Examples of behavior that hinders cooperation and could lead to
|
|
|
|
|
such a decision include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item repeated violation of the commit policy stated above;
|
|
|
|
|
@item repeated failure to take peer criticism into account;
|
|
|
|
|
@item breaching trust through a series of grave incidents.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When maintainers resort to such a decision, they notify developers on
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org}; inquiries may be sent to
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}. Depending on the situation, the
|
|
|
|
|
individual may still be welcome to contribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-24 09:57:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsection Helping Out
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-01 16:11:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
One last thing: the project keeps moving forward because committers not
|
|
|
|
|
only push their own awesome changes, but also offer some of their time
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{reviewing} and pushing other people's changes. As a committer,
|
|
|
|
|
you're welcome to use your expertise and commit rights to help other
|
|
|
|
|
contributors, too!
|
2020-10-10 04:33:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-10 12:49:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Reviewing the Work of Others
|
|
|
|
|
@section Reviewing the Work of Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the biggest action you can do to help GNU Guix grow as a project
|
|
|
|
|
is to review the work contributed by others. You do not need to be a
|
|
|
|
|
committer to do so; applying, reading the source, building, linting and
|
|
|
|
|
running other people's series and sharing your comments about your
|
|
|
|
|
experience will give some confidence to committers. Basically, you gmust
|
|
|
|
|
ensure the check list found in the @ref{Submitting Patches} section has
|
|
|
|
|
been correctly followed. A reviewed patch series should give the best
|
|
|
|
|
chances for the proposed change to be merged faster, so if a change you
|
|
|
|
|
would like to see merged hasn't yet been reviewed, this is the most
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate thing to do!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex reviewing, guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
Review comments should be unambiguous; be as clear and explicit as you
|
|
|
|
|
can about what you think should be changed, ensuring the author can take
|
|
|
|
|
action on it. Please try to keep the following guidelines in mind
|
|
|
|
|
during review:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{Be clear and explicit about changes you are suggesting}, ensuring
|
|
|
|
|
the author can take action on it. In particular, it is a good idea to
|
|
|
|
|
explicitly ask for new revisions when you want it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{Remain focused: do not change the scope of the work being
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed.} For example, if the contribution touches code that follows a
|
|
|
|
|
pattern deemed unwieldy, it would be unfair to ask the submitter to fix
|
|
|
|
|
all occurrences of that pattern in the code; to put it simply, if a
|
|
|
|
|
problem unrelated to the patch at hand was already there, do not ask the
|
|
|
|
|
submitter to fix it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{Ensure progress.} As they respond to review, submitters may
|
|
|
|
|
submit new revisions of their changes; avoid requesting changes that you
|
|
|
|
|
did not request in the previous round of comments. Overall, the
|
|
|
|
|
submitter should get a clear sense of progress; the number of items open
|
|
|
|
|
for discussion should clearly decrease over time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{Aim for finalization.} Reviewing code is time-consuming. Your
|
|
|
|
|
goal as a reviewer is to put the process on a clear path towards
|
|
|
|
|
integration, possibly with agreed-upon changes, or rejection, with a
|
|
|
|
|
clear and mutually-understood reasoning. Avoid leaving the review
|
|
|
|
|
process in a lingering state with no clear way out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{Review is a discussion.} The submitter's and reviewer's views on
|
|
|
|
|
how to achieve a particular change may not always be aligned. To lead
|
|
|
|
|
the discussion, remain focused, ensure progress and aim for
|
|
|
|
|
finalization, spending time proportional to the stakes@footnote{The
|
|
|
|
|
tendency to discuss minute details at length is often referred to as
|
|
|
|
|
``bikeshedding'', where much time is spent discussing each one's
|
|
|
|
|
preference for the color of the shed at the expense of progress made on
|
|
|
|
|
the project to keep bikes dry.}. As a reviewer, try hard to explain the
|
|
|
|
|
rationale for suggestions you make, and to understand and take into
|
|
|
|
|
account the submitter's motivation for doing things in a certain way.
|
|
|
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex LGTM, Looks Good To Me
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex review tags
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex Reviewed-by, git trailer
|
|
|
|
|
When you deem the proposed change adequate and ready for inclusion
|
|
|
|
|
within Guix, the following well understood/codified
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{Reviewed-by:@tie{}Your@tie{}Name<your-email@@example.com>}
|
|
|
|
|
@footnote{The @samp{Reviewed-by} Git trailer is used by other projects
|
|
|
|
|
such as Linux, and is understood by third-party tools such as the
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{b4 am} sub-command, which is able to retrieve the complete
|
|
|
|
|
submission email thread from a public-inbox instance and add the Git
|
|
|
|
|
trailers found in replies to the commit patches.} line should be used to
|
|
|
|
|
sign off as a reviewer, meaning you have reviewed the change and that it
|
|
|
|
|
looks good to you:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
If the @emph{whole} series (containing multiple commits) looks good to
|
|
|
|
|
you, reply with @samp{Reviewed-by:@tie{}Your@tie{}Name<your-email@@example.com>}
|
|
|
|
|
to the cover page if it has one, or to the last patch of the series
|
|
|
|
|
otherwise, adding another @samp{(for the whole series)} comment on the
|
|
|
|
|
line below to explicit this fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
|
|
|
If you instead want to mark a @emph{single commit} as reviewed (but not
|
|
|
|
|
the whole series), simply reply with
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{Reviewed-by:@tie{}Your@tie{}Name<your-email@@example.com>} to that
|
|
|
|
|
commit message.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are not a committer, you can help others find a @emph{series} you
|
|
|
|
|
have reviewed more easily by adding a @code{reviewed-looks-good} usertag
|
|
|
|
|
for the @code{guix} user (@pxref{Debbugs Usertags}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-10 04:33:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@node Updating the Guix Package
|
|
|
|
|
@section Updating the Guix Package
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex update-guix-package, updating the guix package
|
|
|
|
|
It is sometimes desirable to update the @code{guix} package itself (the
|
|
|
|
|
package defined in @code{(gnu packages package-management)}), for
|
|
|
|
|
example to make new daemon features available for use by the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{guix-service-type} service type. In order to simplify this task,
|
|
|
|
|
the following command can be used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
make update-guix-package
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The @code{update-guix-package} make target will use the last known
|
|
|
|
|
@emph{commit} corresponding to @code{HEAD} in your Guix checkout,
|
|
|
|
|
compute the hash of the Guix sources corresponding to that commit and
|
|
|
|
|
update the @code{commit}, @code{revision} and hash of the @code{guix}
|
|
|
|
|
package definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To validate that the updated @code{guix} package hashes are correct and
|
|
|
|
|
that it can be built successfully, the following command can be run from
|
|
|
|
|
the directory of your Guix checkout:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
./pre-inst-env guix build guix
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To guard against accidentally updating the @code{guix} package to a
|
|
|
|
|
commit that others can't refer to, a check is made that the commit used
|
|
|
|
|
has already been pushed to the Savannah-hosted Guix git repository.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This check can be disabled, @emph{at your own peril}, by setting the
|
2020-11-09 18:14:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{GUIX_ALLOW_ME_TO_USE_PRIVATE_COMMIT} environment variable. When
|
|
|
|
|
this variable is set, the updated package source is also added to the
|
|
|
|
|
store. This is used as part of the release process of Guix.
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-15 19:45:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex documentation
|
|
|
|
|
@node Writing Documentation
|
|
|
|
|
@section Writing Documentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guix is documented using the Texinfo system. If you are not yet
|
|
|
|
|
familiar with it, we accept contributions for documentation in most
|
|
|
|
|
formats. That includes plain text, Markdown, Org, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation contributions can be sent to
|
|
|
|
|
@email{guix-patches@@gnu.org}. Prepend @samp{[DOCUMENTATION]} to the
|
|
|
|
|
subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you need to make more than a simple addition to the documentation,
|
|
|
|
|
we prefer that you send a proper patch as opposed to sending an email
|
|
|
|
|
as described above. @xref{Submitting Patches} for more information on
|
|
|
|
|
how to send your patches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To modify the documentation, you need to edit @file{doc/guix.texi} and
|
|
|
|
|
@file{doc/contributing.texi} (which contains this documentation
|
|
|
|
|
section), or @file{doc/guix-cookbook.texi} for the cookbook. If
|
|
|
|
|
you compiled the Guix repository before, you will have
|
|
|
|
|
many more @file{.texi} files that are translations of these
|
|
|
|
|
documents. Do not modify them, the translation is managed through
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/guix, Weblate}.
|
|
|
|
|
@xref{Translating Guix} for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To render documentation, you must first make sure that you ran
|
|
|
|
|
@command{./configure} in your source tree (@pxref{Running Guix Before
|
|
|
|
|
It Is Installed}). After that you can run one of the following
|
|
|
|
|
commands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item @samp{make doc/guix.info} to compile the Info manual.
|
|
|
|
|
You can check it with @command{info doc/guix.info}.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @samp{make doc/guix.html} to compile the HTML version.
|
|
|
|
|
You can point your browser to the relevant file in the
|
|
|
|
|
@file{doc/guix.html} directory.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @samp{make doc/guix-cookbook.info} for the cookbook Info manual.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @samp{make doc/guix-cookbook.html} for the cookbook HTML version.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@cindex translation
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex l10n
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex i18n
|
|
|
|
|
@cindex native language support
|
|
|
|
|
@node Translating Guix
|
|
|
|
|
@section Translating Guix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writing code and packages is not the only way to provide a meaningful
|
|
|
|
|
contribution to Guix. Translating to a language you speak is another
|
|
|
|
|
example of a valuable contribution you can make. This section is designed
|
|
|
|
|
to describe the translation process. It gives you advice on how you can
|
|
|
|
|
get involved, what can be translated, what mistakes you should avoid and
|
|
|
|
|
what we can do to help you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guix is a big project that has multiple components that can be translated.
|
|
|
|
|
We coordinate the translation effort on a
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/guix/,Weblate instance}
|
|
|
|
|
hosted by our friends at Fedora. You will need an account to submit
|
|
|
|
|
translations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some of the software packaged in Guix also contain translations. We do not
|
|
|
|
|
host a translation platform for them. If you want to translate a package
|
2021-05-04 18:47:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
provided by Guix, you should contact their developers or find the information
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
on their website. As an example, you can find the homepage of the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{hello} package by typing @code{guix show hello}. On the ``homepage''
|
|
|
|
|
line, you will see @url{https://www.gnu.org/software/hello/} as the homepage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many GNU and non-GNU packages can be translated on the
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://translationproject.org,Translation Project}. Some projects
|
|
|
|
|
with multiple components have their own platform. For instance, GNOME has
|
|
|
|
|
its own platform, @uref{https://l10n.gnome.org/,Damned Lies}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guix has five components hosted on Weblate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{guix} contains all the strings from the Guix software (the
|
|
|
|
|
guided system installer, the package manager, etc), excluding packages.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{packages} contains the synopsis (single-sentence description
|
|
|
|
|
of a package) and description (longer description) of packages in Guix.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{website} contains the official Guix website, except for
|
|
|
|
|
blog posts and multimedia content.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{documentation-manual} corresponds to this manual.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{documentation-cookbook} is the component for the cookbook.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsubheading General Directions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once you get an account, you should be able to select a component from
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/guix/,the guix project},
|
|
|
|
|
and select a language. If your language does not appear in the list, go
|
|
|
|
|
to the bottom and click on the ``Start new translation'' button. Select
|
|
|
|
|
the language you want to translate to from the list, to start your new
|
|
|
|
|
translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like lots of other free software packages, Guix uses
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext,GNU Gettext} for its translations,
|
|
|
|
|
with which translatable strings are extracted from the source code to so-called
|
|
|
|
|
PO files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even though PO files are text files, changes should not be made with a text
|
|
|
|
|
editor but with PO editing software. Weblate integrates PO editing
|
|
|
|
|
functionality. Alternatively, translators can use any of various
|
|
|
|
|
free-software tools for filling in translations, of which
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://poedit.net/,Poedit} is one example, and (after logging in)
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://docs.weblate.org/en/latest/user/files.html,upload} the changed
|
|
|
|
|
file. There is also a special
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/PoMode,PO editing mode} for users of GNU
|
|
|
|
|
Emacs. Over time translators find out what software they are happy with and
|
|
|
|
|
what features they need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Weblate, you will find various links to the editor, that will show various
|
|
|
|
|
subsets (or all) of the strings. Have a look around and at the
|
|
|
|
|
@uref{https://docs.weblate.org/en/latest/,documentation} to familiarize
|
|
|
|
|
yourself with the platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsubheading Translation Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this section, we provide more detailed guidance on the translation
|
|
|
|
|
process, as well as details on what you should or should not do. When in
|
|
|
|
|
doubt, please contact us, we will be happy to help!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@table @asis
|
|
|
|
|
@item guix
|
|
|
|
|
Guix is written in the Guile programming language, and some strings contain
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
special formatting that is interpreted by Guile. These special formatting
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
should be highlighted by Weblate. They start with @code{~} followed by one
|
|
|
|
|
or more characters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
When printing the string, Guile replaces the special formatting symbols with
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
actual values. For instance, the string @samp{ambiguous package specification
|
|
|
|
|
`~a'} would be substituted to contain said package specification instead of
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{~a}. To properly translate this string, you must keep the formatting
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
code in your translation, although you can place it where it makes sense in
|
|
|
|
|
your language. For instance, the French translation says @samp{spécification
|
|
|
|
|
du paquet « ~a » ambiguë} because the adjective needs to be placed in the
|
|
|
|
|
end of the sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
If there are multiple formatting symbols, make sure to respect the order.
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Guile does not know in which order you intended the string to be read, so it
|
|
|
|
|
will substitute the symbols in the same order as the English sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an example, you cannot translate @samp{package '~a' has been superseded by
|
|
|
|
|
'~a'} by @samp{'~a' superseeds package '~a'}, because the meaning would be
|
2021-05-04 18:47:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
reversed. If @var{foo} is superseded by @var{bar}, the translation would read
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@samp{'foo' superseeds package 'bar'}. To work around this problem, it
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
is possible to use more advanced formatting to select a given piece of data,
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
instead of following the default English order. @xref{Formatted Output,,,
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
guile, GNU Guile Reference Manual}, for more information on formatting in Guile.
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item packages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Package descriptions occasionally contain Texinfo markup (@pxref{Synopses
|
|
|
|
|
and Descriptions}). Texinfo markup looks like @samp{@@code@{rm -rf@}},
|
|
|
|
|
@samp{@@emph@{important@}}, etc. When translating, please leave markup as is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The characters after ``@@'' form the name of the markup, and the text between
|
|
|
|
|
``@{'' and ``@}'' is its content. In general, you should not translate the
|
|
|
|
|
content of markup like @code{@@code}, as it contains literal code that do not
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
change with language. You can translate the content of formatting markup such
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
as @code{@@emph}, @code{@@i}, @code{@@itemize}, @code{@@item}. However, do
|
|
|
|
|
not translate the name of the markup, or it will not be recognized. Do
|
|
|
|
|
not translate the word after @code{@@end}, it is the name of the markup that
|
|
|
|
|
is closed at this position (e.g.@: @code{@@itemize ... @@end itemize}).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item documentation-manual and documentation-cookbook
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first step to ensure a successful translation of the manual is to find
|
|
|
|
|
and translate the following strings @emph{first}:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{version.texi}: Translate this string as @code{version-xx.texi},
|
|
|
|
|
where @code{xx} is your language code (the one shown in the URL on
|
|
|
|
|
weblate).
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{contributing.texi}: Translate this string as
|
|
|
|
|
@code{contributing.xx.texi}, where @code{xx} is the same language code.
|
|
|
|
|
@item @code{Top}: Do not translate this string, it is important for Texinfo.
|
|
|
|
|
If you translate it, the document will be empty (missing a Top node).
|
|
|
|
|
Please look for it, and register @code{Top} as its translation.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translating these strings first ensure we can include your translation in
|
|
|
|
|
the guix repository without breaking the make process or the
|
|
|
|
|
@command{guix pull} machinery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The manual and the cookbook both use Texinfo. As for @code{packages}, please
|
|
|
|
|
keep Texinfo markup as is. There are more possible markup types in the manual
|
|
|
|
|
than in the package descriptions. In general, do not translate the content
|
|
|
|
|
of @code{@@code}, @code{@@file}, @code{@@var}, @code{@@value}, etc. You
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
should translate the content of formatting markup such as @code{@@emph},
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{@@i}, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
The manual contains sections that can be referred to by name by @code{@@ref},
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@code{@@xref} and @code{@@pxref}. We have a mechanism in place so you do
|
|
|
|
|
not have to translate their content. If you keep the English title, we will
|
|
|
|
|
automatically replace it with your translation of that title. This ensures
|
|
|
|
|
that Texinfo will always be able to find the node. If you decide to change
|
|
|
|
|
the translation of the title, the references will automatically be updated
|
|
|
|
|
and you will not have to update them all yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When translating references from the cookbook to the manual, you need to
|
|
|
|
|
replace the name of the manual and the name of the section. For instance,
|
|
|
|
|
to translate @code{@@pxref@{Defining Packages,,, guix, GNU Guix Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Manual@}}, you would replace @code{Defining Packages} with the title of that
|
|
|
|
|
section in the translated manual @emph{only} if that title is translated.
|
|
|
|
|
If the title is not translated in your language yet, do not translate it here,
|
|
|
|
|
or the link will be broken. Replace @code{guix} with @code{guix.xx} where
|
|
|
|
|
@code{xx} is your language code. @code{GNU Guix Reference Manual} is the
|
|
|
|
|
text of the link. You can translate it however you wish.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@item website
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The website pages are written using SXML, an s-expression version of HTML,
|
|
|
|
|
the basic language of the web. We have a process to extract translatable
|
|
|
|
|
strings from the source, and replace complex s-expressions with a more familiar
|
|
|
|
|
XML markup, where each markup is numbered. Translators can arbitrarily change
|
|
|
|
|
the ordering, as in the following example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
|
|
|
#. TRANSLATORS: Defining Packages is a section name
|
|
|
|
|
#. in the English (en) manual.
|
|
|
|
|
#: apps/base/templates/about.scm:64
|
|
|
|
|
msgid "Packages are <1>defined<1.1>en</1.1><1.2>Defining-Packages.html</1.2></1> as native <2>Guile</2> modules."
|
|
|
|
|
msgstr "Pakete werden als reine <2>Guile</2>-Module <1>definiert<1.1>de</1.1><1.2>Pakete-definieren.html</1.2></1>."
|
|
|
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that you need to include the same markups. You cannot skip any.
|
|
|
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In case you make a mistake, the component might fail to build properly with your
|
|
|
|
|
language, or even make guix pull fail. To prevent that, we have a process
|
|
|
|
|
in place to check the content of the files before pushing to our repository.
|
|
|
|
|
We will not be able to update the translation for your language in Guix, so
|
|
|
|
|
we will notify you (through weblate and/or by email) so you get a chance to
|
|
|
|
|
fix the issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsubheading Outside of Weblate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, some parts of Guix cannot be translated on Weblate, help wanted!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item @command{guix pull} news can be translated in @file{news.scm}, but is not
|
|
|
|
|
available from Weblate. If you want to provide a translation, you
|
|
|
|
|
can prepare a patch as described above, or simply send us your
|
|
|
|
|
translation with the name of the news entry you translated and your
|
|
|
|
|
language. @xref{Writing Channel News}, for more information about
|
|
|
|
|
channel news.
|
|
|
|
|
@item Guix blog posts cannot currently be translated.
|
|
|
|
|
@item The installer script (for foreign distributions) is entirely in English.
|
|
|
|
|
@item Some of the libraries Guix uses cannot be translated or are translated
|
|
|
|
|
outside of the Guix project. Guile itself is not internationalized.
|
|
|
|
|
@item Other manuals linked from this manual or the cookbook might not be
|
|
|
|
|
translated.
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-08 12:14:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsubheading Conditions for Inclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no conditions for adding new translations of the @code{guix} and
|
|
|
|
|
@code{guix-packages} components, other than they need at least one translated
|
|
|
|
|
string. New languages will be added to Guix as soon as possible. The
|
|
|
|
|
files may be removed if they fall out of sync and have no more translated
|
|
|
|
|
strings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given that the web site is dedicated to new users, we want its translation
|
|
|
|
|
to be as complete as possible before we include it in the language menu.
|
|
|
|
|
For a new language to be included, it needs to reach at least 80% completion.
|
|
|
|
|
When a language is included, it may be removed in the future if it stays
|
|
|
|
|
out of sync and falls below 60% completion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The manual and cookbook are automatically added in the default compilation
|
2022-05-22 00:00:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
target. Every time we synchronize translations, developers need to
|
2022-03-08 12:14:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
recompile all the translated manuals and cookbooks. This is useless for what
|
|
|
|
|
is essentially the English manual or cookbook. Therefore, we will only
|
|
|
|
|
include a new language when it reaches 10% completion in the component.
|
|
|
|
|
When a language is included, it may be removed in the future if it stays
|
|
|
|
|
out of sync and falls below 5% completion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
@subsubheading Translation Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weblate is backed by a git repository from which it discovers new strings to
|
|
|
|
|
translate and pushes new and updated translations. Normally, it would be
|
|
|
|
|
enough to give it commit access to our repositories. However, we decided
|
|
|
|
|
to use a separate repository for two reasons. First, we would have to give
|
|
|
|
|
Weblate commit access and authorize its signing key, but we do not trust it
|
2021-05-04 18:47:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
in the same way we trust guix developers, especially since we do not manage
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the instance ourselves. Second, if translators mess something up, it can
|
|
|
|
|
break the generation of the website and/or guix pull for all our users,
|
|
|
|
|
independently of their language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For these reasons, we use a dedicated repository to host translations, and we
|
|
|
|
|
synchronize it with our guix and artworks repositories after checking no issue
|
|
|
|
|
was introduced in the translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 18:47:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Developers can download the latest PO files from weblate in the Guix
|
2021-05-30 13:07:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
repository by running the @command{make download-po} command. It will
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
automatically download the latest files from weblate, reformat them to a
|
|
|
|
|
canonical form, and check they do not contain issues. The manual needs to be
|
|
|
|
|
built again to check for additional issues that might crash Texinfo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-04 18:47:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Before pushing new translation files, developers should add them to the
|
2021-04-13 22:16:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
make machinery so the translations are actually available. The process
|
|
|
|
|
differs for the various components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@itemize
|
|
|
|
|
@item New po files for the @code{guix} and @code{packages} components must
|
|
|
|
|
be registered by adding the new language to @file{po/guix/LINGUAS} or
|
|
|
|
|
@file{po/packages/LINGUAS}.
|
|
|
|
|
@item New po files for the @code{documentation-manual} component must be
|
|
|
|
|
registered by adding the file name to @code{DOC_PO_FILES} in
|
|
|
|
|
@file{po/doc/local.mk}, the generated @file{%D%/guix.xx.texi} manual to
|
|
|
|
|
@code{info_TEXINFOS} in @file{doc/local.mk} and the generated
|
|
|
|
|
@file{%D%/guix.xx.texi} and @file{%D%/contributing.xx.texi} to
|
|
|
|
|
@code{TRANSLATED_INFO} also in @file{doc/local.mk}.
|
|
|
|
|
@item New po files for the @code{documentation-cookbook} component must be
|
|
|
|
|
registered by adding the file name to @code{DOC_COOKBOOK_PO_FILES} in
|
|
|
|
|
@file{po/doc/local.mk}, the generated @file{%D%/guix-cookbook.xx.texi}
|
|
|
|
|
manual to @code{info_TEXINFOS} in @file{doc/local.mk} and the generated
|
|
|
|
|
@file{%D%/guix-cookbook.xx.texi} to @code{TRANSLATED_INFO} also
|
|
|
|
|
in @file{doc/local.mk}.
|
|
|
|
|
@item New po files for the @code{website} component must be added to the
|
|
|
|
|
@code{guix-artwork} repository, in @file{website/po/}.
|
|
|
|
|
@file{website/po/LINGUAS} and @file{website/po/ietf-tags.scm} must
|
|
|
|
|
be updated accordingly (see @file{website/i18n-howto.txt} for more
|
|
|
|
|
information on the process).
|
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|